# orderedItems[].content
I'm going to be pulling back typical social-posting on the Fediverse.

I only just started posting here within the past 6 months and recently I've stopped even posting all that much.

I've been thinking a lot the past few years about how things are going to be shaping up.

I'd listen to the various people I found on YouTube. I read mainstream media articles. I followed Twitter. I followed Facebook. I tuned into Kiwifarms. I tuned into the Fediverse.

Through it, I had a constantly evolving notion of my conception of how the state of the world existed and where it was going. After a certain point, it became hard to tell the difference in an "addiction to truth-seeking" from an addiction to the smartphone.

I turned to the Internet decades ago because I was lost when it came to purpose and information. Now, I have both purpose and information in excess, but, my head is so wrapped around future negative outlooks that I'm glued to the fear porn on the screen in the way that you get the sense that if you look away for a second, a decade of activity will have passed you by and you'll not know the importance of what you missed...FOMO.

Things feel like they accelerating faster. A quote I heard recently went like this: "Everyone's an accelerationist when the driver has their foot on the accelerator."

Because of this perception of mine, my tolerance for enjoying anything online that feels "fun" or "memey" has been reduced significantly. I can not laugh when I'm confronted with what feels like the scaffolding coming undone around me within society at large....not as a result of any one particular political figure, but likely as a result of economic forces very large in scale that have been colluding in the cannibalization of this society for many decades now.

When I do come back to the Fediverse, it will either be in a purely business capacity (promoting my business) (probably fairly near term), or it will still be this social aspect, but it will be sometime in the fairly distant future where I would feel a need to start socializing as I had done previously, again.

There really isn't much to say anymore beyond organizing yourself around something you really find value in, and figure out a way that you can maintain your access to it, whatever turbulence may come.

Having your own business that you'd defend to the death really seems like the way to not only get ahead nowadays, but also to maintain your soul. You haven't seen the true bugmen until you've looked inside the corporate machine.

Anyway, last thoughts are that politics and memery and snarky jokes and influencers and recreation all suck and are a distraction from the unsettling feeling that the Economy and the Internet are both being Militarized for a reality down the line where they can conscript endless saps from society into becoming Zogbots to die for Israel against Eurasia and East Asia.

The best use of Internet time and freedom that you have is toward obsession of only true valuable resources so that you have the knowledge to prevent them being stripped from you. You must create your own separate space from those which are certain to collapse in a few years.

In short:
1) Authoritarians are going to gain greater power in the next few years to try to carve up what you have. Left or right-- I don't give a fuck...when you listen to media, you listen to Jews, so stay up to date with headlines instead of keeping up with flashy lights.
2) I don't know where you can run, but if laws continue on the trajectory of becoming overly restrictive and difficult to understand, there may not be much law at all.
3) People and words behind the screen after a certain point are just a comforting placebo. At this stage of the game, the publishing & monetizing is going to be incredibly more important than the subscribing.

Alot of words to say what some of you may already mostly know. Anyway, make your money, White Man, before the imported Saudi Arabians, Indians, Mexicans, Chinese, and blacks run that well dry whilst the Jews pull that one last exit scam to leave the US in a state of totalitarian control, anarchy, or both.

-Dulla

# orderedItems[].formerRepresentations.orderedItems[].content
I'm going to be pulling back typical social-posting on the Fediverse.

I only just started posting here within the past 6 months and recently I've stopped even posting all that much.

I've been thinking a lot the past few years about how things are going to be shaping up.

I'd listen to the various people I found on YouTube. I read mainstream media articles. I followed Twitter. I followed Facebook. I tuned into Kiwifarms. I tuned into the Fediverse.

Through it, I had a constantly evolving notion of my conception of how the state of the world existed and where it was going. After a certain point, it became hard to tell the difference in an "addiction to truth-seeking" from an addiction to the smartphone.

I turned to the Internet decades ago because I was lost when it came to purpose and information. Now, I have both purpose and information in excess, but, my head is so wrapped around future negative outlooks that I'm glued to the fear porn on the screen in the way that you get the sense that if you look away for a second, a decade of activity will have passed you by and you'll not know the importance of what you missed...FOMO.

Things feel like they accelerating faster. A quote I heard recently went like this: "Everyone's an accelerationist when the driver has their foot on the accelerator."

Because of this perception of mine, my tolerance for enjoying anything online that feels "fun" or "memey" has been reduced significantly. I can not laugh when I'm confronted with what feels like the scaffolding coming undone around me within society at large....not as a result of any one particular political figure, but likely as a result of economic forces very large in scale that have been colluding in the cannibalization of this society for many decades now.

When I do come back to the Fediverse, it will either be in a purely business capacity (promoting my business) (probably fairly near term), or it will still be this social aspect, but it will be sometime in the fairly distant future where I would feel a need to start socializing as I had done previously, again.

There really isn't much to say anymore beyond organizing yourself around something you really find value in, and figure out a way that you can maintain your access to it, whatever turbulence may come.

Having your own business that you'd defend to the death really seems like the way to not only get ahead nowadays, but also to maintain your soul. You haven't seen the true bugmen until you've looked inside the corporate machine.

Anyway, last thoughts are that politics and memery and snarky jokes and influencers and recreation all suck and are a distraction from the unsettling feeling that the Economy and the Internet are both being Militarized for a reality down the line where they can conscript endless saps from society into becoming Zogbots to die for Israel against Eurasia and East Asia.

The best use of Internet time and freedom that you have is toward obsession of only true valuable resources so that you have the knowledge to prevent them being stripped from you. You must create your own separate space from those which are certain to collapse in a few years.

In short:
1) Authoritarians are going to gain greater power in the next few years to try to carve up what you have. Left or right-- I don't give a fuck...when you listen to media, you listen to Jews, so stay up to date with headlines instead of keeping up with flashy lights.
2) I don't know where you can run, but if laws continue on the trajectory of becoming overly restrictive and difficult to understand, there may not be much law at all.
3) People and words behind the screen after a certain point are just a comforting placebo. At this stage of the game, the publishing i& monetizing is going to be incredibly more important than the subscribing.

Alot of words to say what some of you may already mostly know. Anyway, make your money, White Man, before the imported Saudi Arabians, Indians, Mexicans, Chinese, and blacks run that well dry whilst the Jews pull that one last exit scam to leave the US in a state of totalitarian control, anarchy, or both.

-Dulla

# orderedItems[].formerRepresentations.orderedItems[].source.content
I'm going to be pulling back typical social-posting on the Fediverse.

I only just started posting here within the past 6 months and recently I've stopped even posting all that much.

I've been thinking a lot the past few years about how things are going to be shaping up.

I'd listen to the various people I found on YouTube. I read mainstream media articles. I followed Twitter. I followed Facebook. I tuned into Kiwifarms. I tuned into the Fediverse.

Through it, I had a constantly evolving notion of my conception of how the state of the world existed and where it was going. After a certain point, it became hard to tell the difference in an "addiction to truth-seeking" from an addiction to the smartphone.

I turned to the Internet decades ago because I was lost when it came to purpose and information. Now, I have both purpose and information in excess, but, my head is so wrapped around future negative outlooks that I'm glued to the fear porn on the screen in the way that you get the sense that if you look away for a second, a decade of activity will have passed you by and you'll not know the importance of what you missed...FOMO.

Things feel like they accelerating faster. A quote I heard recently went like this: "Everyone's an accelerationist when the driver has their foot on the accelerator."

Because of this perception of mine, my tolerance for enjoying anything online that feels "fun" or "memey" has been reduced significantly. I can not laugh when I'm confronted with what feels like the scaffolding coming undone around me within society at large....not as a result of any one particular political figure, but likely as a result of economic forces very large in scale that have been colluding in the cannibalization of this society for many decades now.

When I do come back to the Fediverse, it will either be in a purely business capacity (promoting my business) (probably fairly near term), or it will still be this social aspect, but it will be sometime in the fairly distant future where I would feel a need to start socializing as I had done previously, again.

There really isn't much to say anymore beyond organizing yourself around something you really find value in, and figure out a way that you can maintain your access to it, whatever turbulence may come.

Having your own business that you'd defend to the death really seems like the way to not only get ahead nowadays, but also to maintain your soul. You haven't seen the true bugmen until you've looked inside the corporate machine.

Anyway, last thoughts are that politics and memery and snarky jokes and influencers and recreation all suck and are a distraction from the unsettling feeling that the Economy and the Internet are both being Militarized for a reality down the line where they can conscript endless saps from society into becoming Zogbots to die for Israel against Eurasia and East Asia.

The best use of Internet time and freedom that you have is toward obsession of only true valuable resources so that you have the knowledge to prevent them being stripped from you. You must create your own separate space from those which are certain to collapse in a few years.

In short:
1) Authoritarians are going to gain greater power in the next few years to try to carve up what you have. Left or right-- I don't give a fuck...when you listen to media, you listen to Jews, so stay up to date with headlines instead of keeping up with flashy lights.
2)  I don't know where you can run, but if laws continue on the trajectory of becoming overly restrictive and difficult to understand, there may not be much law at all.
3) People and words behind the screen after a certain point are just a comforting placebo. At this stage of the game, the publishing i& monetizing is going to be incredibly more important than the subscribing.

Alot of words to say what some of you may already mostly know. Anyway, make your money, White Man, before the imported Saudi Arabians, Indians, Mexicans, Chinese, and blacks run that well dry whilst the Jews pull that one last exit scam to leave the US in a state of totalitarian control, anarchy, or both.

-Dulla

# orderedItems[].source.content
I'm going to be pulling back typical social-posting on the Fediverse.

I only just started posting here within the past 6 months and recently I've stopped even posting all that much.

I've been thinking a lot the past few years about how things are going to be shaping up.

I'd listen to the various people I found on YouTube. I read mainstream media articles. I followed Twitter. I followed Facebook. I tuned into Kiwifarms. I tuned into the Fediverse.

Through it, I had a constantly evolving notion of my conception of how the state of the world existed and where it was going. After a certain point, it became hard to tell the difference in an "addiction to truth-seeking" from an addiction to the smartphone.

I turned to the Internet decades ago because I was lost when it came to purpose and information. Now, I have both purpose and information in excess, but, my head is so wrapped around future negative outlooks that I'm glued to the fear porn on the screen in the way that you get the sense that if you look away for a second, a decade of activity will have passed you by and you'll not know the importance of what you missed...FOMO.

Things feel like they accelerating faster. A quote I heard recently went like this: "Everyone's an accelerationist when the driver has their foot on the accelerator."

Because of this perception of mine, my tolerance for enjoying anything online that feels "fun" or "memey" has been reduced significantly. I can not laugh when I'm confronted with what feels like the scaffolding coming undone around me within society at large....not as a result of any one particular political figure, but likely as a result of economic forces very large in scale that have been colluding in the cannibalization of this society for many decades now.

When I do come back to the Fediverse, it will either be in a purely business capacity (promoting my business) (probably fairly near term), or it will still be this social aspect, but it will be sometime in the fairly distant future where I would feel a need to start socializing as I had done previously, again.

There really isn't much to say anymore beyond organizing yourself around something you really find value in, and figure out a way that you can maintain your access to it, whatever turbulence may come.

Having your own business that you'd defend to the death really seems like the way to not only get ahead nowadays, but also to maintain your soul. You haven't seen the true bugmen until you've looked inside the corporate machine.

Anyway, last thoughts are that politics and memery and snarky jokes and influencers and recreation all suck and are a distraction from the unsettling feeling that the Economy and the Internet are both being Militarized for a reality down the line where they can conscript endless saps from society into becoming Zogbots to die for Israel against Eurasia and East Asia.

The best use of Internet time and freedom that you have is toward obsession of only true valuable resources so that you have the knowledge to prevent them being stripped from you. You must create your own separate space from those which are certain to collapse in a few years.

In short:
1) Authoritarians are going to gain greater power in the next few years to try to carve up what you have. Left or right-- I don't give a fuck...when you listen to media, you listen to Jews, so stay up to date with headlines instead of keeping up with flashy lights.
2)  I don't know where you can run, but if laws continue on the trajectory of becoming overly restrictive and difficult to understand, there may not be much law at all.
3) People and words behind the screen after a certain point are just a comforting placebo. At this stage of the game, the publishing & monetizing is going to be incredibly more important than the subscribing.

Alot of words to say what some of you may already mostly know. Anyway, make your money, White Man, before the imported Saudi Arabians, Indians, Mexicans, Chinese, and blacks run that well dry whilst the Jews pull that one last exit scam to leave the US in a state of totalitarian control, anarchy, or both.

-Dulla

# orderedItems[].content
Destiny on yesterday's stream calling out Kiwifarms and other anti-fan communities mentioned that one of his orbiters-turned-alogs named Chud Logic has a Discord Server which Destiny refers to as "Discord Kiwifarms" where a number of his streamer anti-fans meet up to collaborate.

I joined it out of curiosity and Destiny's description of it matches up pretty well. There's similar high energy, react sektur e-drama culture, and some decent social commentary takes there, such as the ones attached below about redditors. Interesting server.

Destiny Stream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0E21rtwUfAo
Chud Logic's Discord Server: https://discord.gg/chudlogic

# orderedItems[].formerRepresentations.orderedItems[].content
Destiny on yesterday's stream calling out Kiwifarms and other anti-fan communities mentioned that one of his orbiters-turned-alogs named Chud Logic has a Discord Server which Destiny refers to as "Discord Kiwifarms" where a number of his streamer anti-fans meet up to collaborate.

I joined it out of curiosity and Destiny's description of it matches up pretty well. There's similar high energy, react sektur e-drama culture, and some decent social commentary takes there, such as the ones attached below about redditors. Interesting server.

Destiny Stream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0E21rtwUfAo
Chud's Discord Server: https://discord.gg/chudlogic

# orderedItems[].formerRepresentations.orderedItems[].source.content
Destiny on yesterday's stream calling out Kiwifarms and other anti-fan communities mentioned that one of his orbiters-turned-alogs named Chud Logic has a Discord Server which Destiny refers to as "Discord Kiwifarms" where a number of his streamer anti-fans meet up to collaborate. 

I joined it out of curiosity and Destiny's description of it matches up pretty well. There's similar high energy, react sektur e-drama culture, and some decent social commentary takes there, such as the ones attached below about redditors. Interesting server.

Destiny Stream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0E21rtwUfAo
Chud's Discord Server: https://discord.gg/chudlogic

# orderedItems[].source.content
Destiny on yesterday's stream calling out Kiwifarms and other anti-fan communities mentioned that one of his orbiters-turned-alogs named Chud Logic has a Discord Server which Destiny refers to as "Discord Kiwifarms" where a number of his streamer anti-fans meet up to collaborate. 

I joined it out of curiosity and Destiny's description of it matches up pretty well. There's similar high energy, react sektur e-drama culture, and some decent social commentary takes there, such as the ones attached below about redditors. Interesting server.

Destiny Stream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0E21rtwUfAo
Chud Logic's Discord Server: https://discord.gg/chudlogic

# orderedItems[].content
Destiny is a soy, limp-wristed faggot and that's why it's always bittersweet when he's correct on a topic, and as much as many people on this side of the Internet may not like it, when it comes to deconstructing a given situation and providing prescriptions for analogous scenarios, he's been pretty damn near on the ball from what I've see of his streaming career within the past 5 years.

One of his current streamer alogs clipped the following clip from maybe a year or two ago where Destiny is discussing what the reality of Internet public consciousness and narrative-building on the Internet looks like. This is all too relevant to Destiny given his current situation.

Moreover, the point he makes here in the following clip is actually possibly the most important point he's ever made, and what I would consider the most important fact of the Social Internet since social media has existed and likely into the future as well.

Destiny in the clip states that the reality of the situation when it comes to influencers online is that ultimately they can be mogged by coordinated alog narrative-building (effectively) defamatory gaslighting by fast-paced lore discussion echo chambers (eg Destiny's Kiwifarms thread), as well as select "endearing" e-influencer alogs who can pick and choose which facts they want to report on and which they don't to tactfully build a perception/narrative of someone as a negative caricature of who they are and the what they have said/meant. Furthermore, Destiny goes onto say that these narratives can be kept alive, bubbling under the surface, so that when Destiny gets into a fight with someone online, all these narratives can be brought out to be used as leverage by whomever quarreling with Destiny at a given moment if they wanted to fight dirty online. To put it in EU4 terminology, it's like having a coalition built against you, and any more aggressive expansion will get more members into the coalition against you until you're basically out of countries to take over because they are all in the coalition.

TL;DR Alogs can win out with fan fiction if you don't address it properly, so in my opinion, you're probably better off strategically playing nice with fan fiction distributors rather than trying to fight them, because they are more agile than you, have more time to dedicate to crafting narratives, and can collectivize your enemies under a single banner if they really wanted to.

# orderedItems[].source.content
Destiny is a soy, limp-wristed faggot and that's why it's always bittersweet when he's correct on a topic, and as much as many people on this side of the Internet may not like it, when it comes to deconstructing a given situation and providing prescriptions for analogous scenarios, he's been pretty damn near on the ball from what I've see of his streaming career within the past 5 years.

One of his current streamer alogs clipped the following clip from maybe a year or two ago where Destiny is discussing what the reality of Internet public consciousness and narrative-building on the Internet looks like. This is all too relevant to Destiny given his current situation.

Moreover, the point he makes here in the following clip is actually possibly the most important point he's ever made, and what I would consider the most important fact of the Social Internet since social media has existed and likely into the future as well.

Destiny in the clip states that the reality of the situation when it comes to influencers online is that ultimately they can be mogged by coordinated alog narrative-building (effectively) defamatory gaslighting by fast-paced lore discussion echo chambers (eg Destiny's Kiwifarms thread), as well as select "endearing" e-influencer alogs who can pick and choose which facts they want to report on and which they don't to tactfully build a perception/narrative of someone as a negative caricature of who they are and the what they have said/meant. Furthermore, Destiny goes onto say that these narratives can be kept alive, bubbling under the surface, so that when Destiny gets into a fight with someone online, all these narratives can be brought out to be used as leverage by whomever quarreling with Destiny at a given moment if they wanted to fight dirty online. To put it in EU4 terminology, it's like having a coalition built against you, and any more aggressive expansion will get more members into the coalition against you until you're basically out of countries to take over because they are all in the coalition.

TL;DR Alogs can win out with fan fiction if you don't address it properly, so in my opinion, you're probably better off strategically playing nice with fan fiction distributors rather than trying to fight them, because they are more agile than you, have more time to dedicate to crafting narratives, and can collectivize your enemies under a single banner if they really wanted to.

# orderedItems[].summary
Coordinated Influencer Alog Gaslighting Becomes "Truth Of The Internet"

# orderedItems[].content
GDP Obsessives are here to stay, and will only increase in quantity and voice.

They are institutionalists and billionaires alike that support "GDP is everything" talking points, because GDP is the system as it exists and in which they are still in power.

With this assumption held, you have a couple of options for navigating it:

1) [BEST OPTION] Make an obscene amount of money legally for something which in theory is worth tremendously less than you are getting paid for it, and then fund your wives and consorts much like as a hegemonic company would as a loss leader. You no longer have to worry about GDP any more because you are rich, and getting richer without you having to do anything.
2) Make an obscene amount of money on the black market, and risk law enforcement and the underhanded criminal elements doing you in.
3) Make your own nation and face off against the inevitable military and paramilitary groups that will be tasked to "quell your rebellion".
4) Work a regime-approved middle-of-the-road fake job and try to dissassociate from the fact that your job is meaningless and the people you surround yourself with are retarded and don't matter.
5) Suffer and seethe in silence (or in your own echo chamber) as a poorfag.

# orderedItems[].formerRepresentations.orderedItems[].content
GDP Obsessives are here to stay, and will only increase in quantity and voice.

They are institutionalists and billionaires alike that support "GDP is everything" talking points, because GDP is the system as it exists and in which they are still in power.

With this assumption held, you have a couple of options for navigating it:

1) [BEST OPTION] Make an obscene amount of money legally for something which in theory is worth tremendously less than you are getting paid for it, and then fund your wives and consorts much like as a hegemonic company would as a loss leader. You no longer have to worry about GDP any more because you are rich, and geting richer without you having to do anything.
2) Make an obscene amount of money on the black market, and risk law enforcement and the underhanded criminal elements doing you in.
3) Make your own nation and face off against the inevitable military and paramilitary groups that will be tasked to "quell your rebellion".
4) Work a regime-approved middle-of-the-road fake job and try to dissassociate from the fact that your job is meaningless and the people you surround yourself with are retarded and don't matter.
5) Suffer and seethe in silence (or in your own echo chamber) as a poorfag.

# orderedItems[].formerRepresentations.orderedItems[].source.content
GDP Obsessives are here to stay, and will only increase in quantity and voice. 

They are institutionalists and billionaires alike that support "GDP is everything" talking points, because GDP is the system as it exists and in which they are still in power.

With this assumption held, you have a couple of options for navigating it:

1) [BEST OPTION] Make an obscene amount of money legally for something which in theory is worth tremendously less than you are getting paid for it, and then fund your wives and consorts much like as a hegemonic company would as a loss leader. You no longer have to worry about GDP any more because you are rich, and geting richer without you having to do anything.
2) Make an obscene amount of money on the black market, and risk law enforcement and the underhanded criminal elements doing you in.
3) Make your own nation and face off against the inevitable military and paramilitary groups that will be tasked to "quell your rebellion".
4) Work a regime-approved middle-of-the-road fake job and try to dissassociate from the fact that your job is meaningless and the people you surround yourself with are retarded and don't matter.
5) Suffer and seethe in silence (or in your own echo chamber) as a poorfag.

# orderedItems[].formerRepresentations.orderedItems[].summary
Navigating the Bully Pulpit of GDP Obsessives

# orderedItems[].formerRepresentations.orderedItems[].content
GDP Obsessives are here to stay, and will only increase.

They are institutionalists and billionaires alike that support "GDP is everything" talking points, because GDP is the system as it exists and in which they are still in power.

With this assumption held, you have a couple of options for navigating it:

1) [BEST OPTION] Make an obscene amount of money legally for something which in theory is worth tremendously less than you are getting paid for it, and then fund your wives and consorts much like as a hegemonic company would as a loss leader. You no longer have to worry about GDP any more because you are rich, and geting richer without you having to do anything.
2) Make an obscene amount of money on the black market, and risk law enforcement and the underhanded criminal elements doing you in.
3) Make your own nation and face off against the inevitable military and paramilitary groups that will be tasked to "quell your rebellion".
4) Work a regime-approved middle-of-the-road fake job and try to dissassociate from the fact that your job is meaningless and the people you surround yourself with are retarded and don't matter.
5) Suffer and seethe in silence (or in your own echo chamber) as a poorfag.

# orderedItems[].formerRepresentations.orderedItems[].source.content
GDP Obsessives are here to stay, and will only increase. 

They are institutionalists and billionaires alike that support "GDP is everything" talking points, because GDP is the system as it exists and in which they are still in power.

With this assumption held, you have a couple of options for navigating it:

1) [BEST OPTION] Make an obscene amount of money legally for something which in theory is worth tremendously less than you are getting paid for it, and then fund your wives and consorts much like as a hegemonic company would as a loss leader. You no longer have to worry about GDP any more because you are rich, and geting richer without you having to do anything.
2) Make an obscene amount of money on the black market, and risk law enforcement and the underhanded criminal elements doing you in.
3) Make your own nation and face off against the inevitable military and paramilitary groups that will be tasked to "quell your rebellion".
4) Work a regime-approved middle-of-the-road fake job and try to dissassociate from the fact that your job is meaningless and the people you surround yourself with are retarded and don't matter.
5) Suffer and seethe in silence (or in your own echo chamber) as a poorfag.

# orderedItems[].formerRepresentations.orderedItems[].summary
Navigating the Bully Pulpit of GDP Obsessives

# orderedItems[].source.content
GDP Obsessives are here to stay, and will only increase in quantity and voice. 

They are institutionalists and billionaires alike that support "GDP is everything" talking points, because GDP is the system as it exists and in which they are still in power.

With this assumption held, you have a couple of options for navigating it:

1) [BEST OPTION] Make an obscene amount of money legally for something which in theory is worth tremendously less than you are getting paid for it, and then fund your wives and consorts much like as a hegemonic company would as a loss leader. You no longer have to worry about GDP any more because you are rich, and getting richer without you having to do anything.
2) Make an obscene amount of money on the black market, and risk law enforcement and the underhanded criminal elements doing you in.
3) Make your own nation and face off against the inevitable military and paramilitary groups that will be tasked to "quell your rebellion".
4) Work a regime-approved middle-of-the-road fake job and try to dissassociate from the fact that your job is meaningless and the people you surround yourself with are retarded and don't matter.
5) Suffer and seethe in silence (or in your own echo chamber) as a poorfag.

# orderedItems[].summary
Navigating the Bully Pulpit of GDP Obsessives

# orderedItems[].content
Modern Globalists be like:

"The people can choose the law and punishments. We'll choose the enforcers (us) and the punished (you)."

# orderedItems[].source.content
Modern Globalists be like:

"The people can choose the law and punishments. We'll choose the enforcers (us) and the punished (you)."

# orderedItems[].content
Until FASAB S-56 gets repealed, the economy is basically fake.

FASAB S-56 allows the government to funnel away as much money as they want without disclosing how much or for what purpose.

It went into effect a couple of years ago.

Essentially, all these theatrics in the media about "so-and-so wants to remove the funding in ABC" or "so-and-so wants to add funding in XYZ" don't make a lick of difference to the economy when the Secret Black Box Black Budget is literally used at this point in time as a free money glitch where glowies can magically extract unlimited money from it.

That unlimited money extraction is where inflation comes from. It's not a billion here or there. It's the untold figures of which we have no idea whereas while we're all staring at the money printer go brrrrr, there may be 20,000 other money printers that we can't even see (they're for glowie eyes only).

Catherine Austin Fitts discussed this in her video "The Black Budget" a couple years ago, and has been discussing it since. Whitney Webb has carried this torch in recent years too.

As far as the economy is concerned, this is the biggest black hole bar none, and we don't even have a guess as to how deep it really goes.

x.com/_whitneywebb/status/1886468841741353151?t=WGMkrPCTmoIWeOpb469GRw&s=19
www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/secret-government-spending-779959/
youtu.be/w0mimIp8mr8?si=01fdbDZXJ7yvwPvu

# orderedItems[].formerRepresentations.orderedItems[].content
Until FASAB S-56 gets repealed, the economy is basically fake.

FASAB S-56 allows the government to funnel away as much money as they want without disclosing how much or for what purpose.

It went into effect a couple of years ago.

Essentially, all these theatrics in the media about "so-and-so wants to remove the funding in ABC" or "so-and-so wants to add funding in XYZ" don't make a lick of difference to the economy when the Secret Black Box Black Budget is literally used at this point in time as a free money glitch where glowies can magically extract unlimited money from it.

That unlimited money extraction is where inflation comes from. It's not a billion here or there. It's the untold figures of which we have no idea whereas while we're all staring at the money printer go brrrrr, there may be 20,000 other money printers that we can't even see (they're for glowie eyes only).

Catherine Austin Fitts discussed this in her video "The Black Budget" a couple years ago, and has been discussing it since. Whitney Webb has carried this torch in recent years too.

As far as the economy is concerned, this is the biggest black hole bar none, and we don't even have a guess as to how deep it really goes.

# orderedItems[].formerRepresentations.orderedItems[].source.content
Until FASAB S-56 gets repealed, the economy is basically fake.

FASAB S-56 allows the government to funnel away as much money as they want without disclosing how much or for what purpose.

It went into effect a couple of years ago.

Essentially, all these theatrics in the media about "so-and-so wants to remove the funding in ABC" or "so-and-so wants to add funding in XYZ" don't make a lick of difference to the economy when the Secret Black Box Black Budget is literally used at this point in time as a free money glitch where glowies can magically extract unlimited money from it.

That unlimited money extraction is where inflation comes from. It's not a billion here or there. It's the untold figures of which we have no idea whereas while we're all staring at the money printer go brrrrr, there may be 20,000 other money printers that we can't even see (they're for glowie eyes only).

Catherine Austin Fitts discussed this in her video "The Black Budget" a couple years ago, and has been discussing it since. Whitney Webb has carried this torch in recent years too. 

As far as the economy is concerned, this is the biggest black hole bar none, and we don't even have a guess as to how deep it really goes.

# orderedItems[].source.content
Until FASAB S-56 gets repealed, the economy is basically fake.

FASAB S-56 allows the government to funnel away as much money as they want without disclosing how much or for what purpose.

It went into effect a couple of years ago.

Essentially, all these theatrics in the media about "so-and-so wants to remove the funding in ABC" or "so-and-so wants to add funding in XYZ" don't make a lick of difference to the economy when the Secret Black Box Black Budget is literally used at this point in time as a free money glitch where glowies can magically extract unlimited money from it.

That unlimited money extraction is where inflation comes from. It's not a billion here or there. It's the untold figures of which we have no idea whereas while we're all staring at the money printer go brrrrr, there may be 20,000 other money printers that we can't even see (they're for glowie eyes only).

Catherine Austin Fitts discussed this in her video "The Black Budget" a couple years ago, and has been discussing it since. Whitney Webb has carried this torch in recent years too. 

As far as the economy is concerned, this is the biggest black hole bar none, and we don't even have a guess as to how deep it really goes.

x.com/_whitneywebb/status/1886468841741353151?t=WGMkrPCTmoIWeOpb469GRw&s=19
www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/secret-government-spending-779959/
youtu.be/w0mimIp8mr8?si=01fdbDZXJ7yvwPvu

# orderedItems[].content
Whitney's blackpills tend to always be pretty realistic, and she's right on a couple counts here as far as I'm concerned.

To the first point-- she claims that USAID is basically just going to be re-housed under an overtly governmental entity-- in this case it's the Rubio-run State Department.

On the second point-- she claims that Musk having access to all of the citizens' Treasury data will be utilized so that he can take all of that and integrate it into X to become the West's WeChat.

On both counts, I would bet on Webb being correct even though both of these shifts are at the very highest orders of magnitude when it comes to politics.

The US regime tastemakers seem to be transitioning from the Sorosbux Karl Popper Open Society International-Rules-Based-LGBTQJISFSFSJIUFDEFRSD2IA-Order Soft Power Kissinger Realpolitik Society into an explicit domineering Trumpian hard-nosed potentially Realist School International Relations Based negotiation and ceremonial expressiveness with an onshore manufacturing laconic outlook, all underpinned by a Palantir Thielbux Social Media Complex of microinfluencers on the Thiel payroll dedicated to corral every fragment of dissident populist thought into a makeshift coalition that can be reigned over effectively by the authoritarian despotic Trump-aligned key billionaire class.

# orderedItems[].formerRepresentations.orderedItems[].content
Whitney's blackpills tend to always be pretty realistic, and she's right on a couple counts here as far as I'm concerned.

To the first point-- she claims that USAID is basically just going to be re-housed under an overtly governmental entity-- in this case it's the Rubio-run State Department.

On the second point-- she claims that Musk having access to all of the citizens' Treasury data will be utilized so that he can take all of that and integrate it into X to become the West's WeChat.

On both counts, I would bet on Webb being correct even though both of these shifts are at the very highest orders of magnitude when it comes to politics.

The US regime tastemakers seem to be transitioning from the Sorosbux Karl Popper Open Society International-Rules-Based-LGBTQJISFSFSJIUFDEFRSD2IA-Order Soft Power Kissinger Realpolitik Society into an explicit domineering Trumpian hard-nosed potentially Realist School International Relations Based negotiation and ceremonial expressiveness with an onshore manufacturing laconic outlook, all underpinned by a Palantir Thielbux Social Media Complex of microinfluencers on the Thiel payroll dedicated to corral every fragment of dissident populist thought into a makeshift coalition that can be reigned over effectively by the authoritarian despotic Trump-aligned key billionaire class.

# orderedItems[].formerRepresentations.orderedItems[].source.content
Whitney's blackpills tend to always be pretty realistic, and she's right on a couple counts here as far as I'm concerned.

To the first point-- she claims that USAID is basically just going to be re-housed under an overtly governmental entity-- in this case it's the Rubio-run State Department. 

On the second point-- she claims that Musk having access to all of the citizens' Treasury data will be utilized so that he can take all of that and integrate it into X to become the West's WeChat.

On both counts, I would bet on Webb being correct even though both of these shifts are at the very highest orders of magnitude when it comes to politics.

The US regime tastemakers seem to be transitioning from the Sorosbux Karl Popper Open Society International-Rules-Based-LGBTQJISFSFSJIUFDEFRSD2IA-Order Soft Power Kissinger Realpolitik Society into an explicit domineering Trumpian hard-nosed potentially Realist School International Relations Based negotiation and ceremonial expressiveness with an onshore manufacturing laconic outlook, all underpinned by a Palantir Thielbux Social Media Complex of microinfluencers on the Thiel payroll dedicated to corral every fragment of dissident populist thought into a makeshift coalition that can be reigned over effectively by the authoritarian despotic Trump-aligned key billionaire class.

# orderedItems[].formerRepresentations.orderedItems[].summary
The Trump Regime = The Regime's Transition To A Chinese-Style Society

# orderedItems[].source.content
Whitney's blackpills tend to always be pretty realistic, and she's right on a couple counts here as far as I'm concerned.

To the first point-- she claims that USAID is basically just going to be re-housed under an overtly governmental entity-- in this case it's the Rubio-run State Department. 

On the second point-- she claims that Musk having access to all of the citizens' Treasury data will be utilized so that he can take all of that and integrate it into X to become the West's WeChat.

On both counts, I would bet on Webb being correct even though both of these shifts are at the very highest orders of magnitude when it comes to politics.

The US regime tastemakers seem to be transitioning from the Sorosbux Karl Popper Open Society International-Rules-Based-LGBTQJISFSFSJIUFDEFRSD2IA-Order Soft Power Kissinger Realpolitik Society into an explicit domineering Trumpian hard-nosed potentially Realist School International Relations Based negotiation and ceremonial expressiveness with an onshore manufacturing laconic outlook, all underpinned by a Palantir Thielbux Social Media Complex of microinfluencers on the Thiel payroll dedicated to corral every fragment of dissident populist thought into a makeshift coalition that can be reigned over effectively by the authoritarian despotic Trump-aligned key billionaire class.

# orderedItems[].summary
The Trump Takeover = The Regime's Transition To A Chinese-Style Society

# orderedItems[].content
Have you noticed how CNBC always points out apparent problems but never points out solutions, other than fake solutions that are like "put your faith in this wealthy retard who definitely won't not solve all the problems and will rob you instead"?

CNBC never seems to tell you how to resolve your issues locally. You never hear them telling you how to build large families with 10 kids. You never hear them telling you about white excellence and how as white men, you can lead others to greatness.

No. What they do is this bullshit whereby they tell you about some "problem" that they themselves and their business partners CREATED so that they could bilk the rest of White America so that they could jetset across the globe and waste away in Margaritaville like the faggot boomers they are.

CNBC, NBC, CBS, ABC etc need to be forcibly claimed and made to have a culture shift to promote values of white excellence, prosperity and large family-building.

https://youtu.be/klEgakT56c0?si=iqT90Dp5uzSnU7cS

# orderedItems[].source.content
Have you noticed how CNBC always points out apparent problems but never points out solutions, other than fake solutions that are like "put your faith in this wealthy retard who definitely won't not solve all the problems and will rob you instead"?

CNBC never seems to tell you how to resolve your issues locally. You never hear them telling you how to build large families with 10 kids. You never hear them telling you about white excellence and how as white men, you can lead others to greatness.

No. What they do is this bullshit whereby they tell you about some "problem" that they themselves and their business partners CREATED so that they could bilk the rest of White America so that they could jetset across the globe and waste away in Margaritaville like the faggot boomers they are.

CNBC, NBC, CBS, ABC etc need to be forcibly claimed and made to have a culture shift to promote values of white excellence, prosperity and large family-building.

https://youtu.be/klEgakT56c0?si=iqT90Dp5uzSnU7cS

# orderedItems[].content
If there was ever a time that even the "distinguished" mainstream media was explicit about telling white men to kill themselves, it's right now.

This CNBC puff piece for Zyn appeared on my YouTube feed today in which the comment section has wisened up to that fact that this basically is just an ad for Phillip Morris International, the tobacco company. https://youtu.be/LTZlGXZlIgQ?si=qs3tE8AVAmaAG4C9

The NYT was running the same shit a couple of months ago on their Instagram Feed where they were promoting Vapes and Zyns.

The left wing in the US historically prided itself on being the party of health, and now they've just gone full mask off and are trying to sell literal cancer to their audience for a pittance. They've gone full 30 pieces of silver on their viewership, doing their best to completely strip themselves of their last vestiges of credibility.

This is in the wake of all of the other bullshit that has been pushed in recent years to fuck people up.

Imagine how malicious you'd have to be to run newspapers where you're trying to coax your audience to go die. Couldn't be me.

# orderedItems[].formerRepresentations.orderedItems[].content
If there was ever a time that even the "distinguished" mainstream media was explicit about telling white men to kill themselves, it's right now.

This CNBC puff piece for Zyn appeared on my YouTube feed today in which the comment section has wisened up to that fact that this basically is just an ad for Phillip Morris International, the tobacco company. https://youtu.be/LTZlGXZlIgQ?si=qs3tE8AVAmaAG4C9

The NYT was running the same shit a couple of months ago on their Instagram Feed where they were promoting Vapes and Zyns.

The left wing in the US historically prided itself on being the party of health, and now they've just gone full mask off and are trying to sell literal cancer to their audience for a pittance. They've gone full 30 pieces of silver on their viewership, doing their best to completely strip themselves of their last vestiges of credibility.

This is the wake of all of the other bullshit that has been pushed in recent years to fuck people up.

Imagine how malicious you'd have to be to run newspapers where you're trying to coax your audience to go die. Couldn't be me.

# orderedItems[].formerRepresentations.orderedItems[].source.content
If there was ever a time that even the "distinguished" mainstream media was explicit about telling white men to kill themselves, it's right now. 

This CNBC puff piece for Zyn appeared on my YouTube feed today in which the comment section has wisened up to that fact that this basically is just an ad for Phillip Morris International, the tobacco company. https://youtu.be/LTZlGXZlIgQ?si=qs3tE8AVAmaAG4C9

The NYT was running the same shit a couple of months ago on their Instagram Feed where they were promoting Vapes and Zyns.

The left wing in the US historically prided itself on being the party of health, and now they've just gone full mask off and are trying to sell literal cancer to their audience for a pittance. They've gone full 30 pieces of silver on their viewership, doing their best to completely strip themselves of their last vestiges of credibility.

This is the wake of all of the other bullshit that has been pushed in recent years to fuck people up. 

Imagine how malicious you'd have to be to run newspapers where you're trying to coax your audience to go die. Couldn't be me.

# orderedItems[].source.content
If there was ever a time that even the "distinguished" mainstream media was explicit about telling white men to kill themselves, it's right now. 

This CNBC puff piece for Zyn appeared on my YouTube feed today in which the comment section has wisened up to that fact that this basically is just an ad for Phillip Morris International, the tobacco company. https://youtu.be/LTZlGXZlIgQ?si=qs3tE8AVAmaAG4C9

The NYT was running the same shit a couple of months ago on their Instagram Feed where they were promoting Vapes and Zyns.

The left wing in the US historically prided itself on being the party of health, and now they've just gone full mask off and are trying to sell literal cancer to their audience for a pittance. They've gone full 30 pieces of silver on their viewership, doing their best to completely strip themselves of their last vestiges of credibility.

This is in the wake of all of the other bullshit that has been pushed in recent years to fuck people up. 

Imagine how malicious you'd have to be to run newspapers where you're trying to coax your audience to go die. Couldn't be me.

# orderedItems[].content
When your rural country bumpkins or suburban domestics say that they "don't do online", what they really mean is that they are online, but use the Internet to a limited degree on pretty mainstream platforms for very basic social and shopping interactions. It sometimes also means that they use a platform, but that the platform doesn't really capture the experience that they are looking for.

About everyone is in some way online. It's just a matter of what websites they navigate to. Those websites most closely match what they're looking for, given their awareness about what's out there.

# orderedItems[].source.content
When your rural country bumpkins or suburban domestics say that they "don't do online", what they really mean is that they are online, but use the Internet to a limited degree on pretty mainstream platforms for very basic social and shopping interactions. It sometimes also means that they use a platform, but that the platform doesn't really capture the experience that they are looking for.

About everyone is in some way online. It's just a matter of what websites they navigate to. Those websites most closely match what they're looking for, given their awareness about what's out there.

# orderedItems[].content
Year or two old meme vid but it's wild to think there's still a bunch of people out there like this unironically in current year. Plenty of them in my locale.

Brutish slave morality.

Hard work is great, but people who brag about engaging in self-harming masochistic slave work so that their Jewish masters can get paid are people who require too many resources to tardwrangle effectively.

# orderedItems[].source.content
Year or two old meme vid but it's wild to think there's still a bunch of people out there like this unironically in current year. Plenty of them in my locale.

Brutish slave morality. 

Hard work is great, but people who brag about engaging in self-harming masochistic slave work so that their Jewish masters can get paid are people who require too many resources to tardwrangle effectively.

# orderedItems[].content
The signature of the "Remilia Network" is that they will just broadcast and relay their messaging across each of their near-identical fumo-eque avis, in a sort of daisy chain of clout-boosting. What's interesting here is that they will relay seemingly whatever message content so long as it's from people within their audience, so for example they'll make a meme out of that they are just getting paid by Peter Thiel and then circulate it around.

The way that Remilia operates on social media feels to me like the canary in the coal mine of what we can expect ALL across social media in the future:

>underground digital economy NFT avis with little distinction between eachother
>minimal to no expressions of opinions online, only spreading cult images and terminology
>unapologetic and massive cult marketing efforts of the branding and its linkages with the financial component (the meme coin)
>an esoteric cult leader who is likely just an operator for the Thiel Network, who is the only one of the entire cult that expresses any commentary beyond memetic cult phrases

It's empty. It's disconnected. It's Cyberia and the Wired. Whoever is making bank on Remilia, it's certainly not you. It serves to spam up your mindshare, attention economy, and social media news feed.

And yet, it's one of the biggest online entropic forces around, with at least hundreds of those cherubic little anime faces populating "dissident right" corners of Twitter.

Now when it comes down to all my criticism of it, I'm not saying that I have a principled stance against the Remilia Network, but rather that I'm not getting paid by it, and that they seem to spam up my feed. Perhaps others may choose to try and replicate their seeming social media success, but then again perhaps you'd need to be a Tech Magnate with standby AI content generating teams and click-contractors in order to make a financial grift disguised as an e-cult.

# orderedItems[].formerRepresentations.orderedItems[].content
The signature of the "Remilia Network" is that they will just broadcast and relay their messaging across each of their near-identical fumo-eque avis, in a sort of daisy chain of clout-boosting. What's interesting here is that they will relay seemingly whatever message content so long as it's from people within their audience, so for example they'll make a meme out of that they are just getting paid by Peter Thiel and then circulate it around.

The way that Remilia operates on social media feels to me like the canary in the coal mine of what we can expect ALL across social media in the future:

>underground digital economy NFT avis with little distinction between eachother
>minimal to no expressions of opinions online, only spreading cult images and terminology
>unapologetic and massive cult marketing efforts of the branding and its linkages with the financial component (the meme coin)
>an esoteric cult leader who is likely just an operator for the Thiel Network, who is the only one of the entire cult that expresses any commentary beyond memetic cult phrases

It's empty. It's disconnected. It's Cyberia and the Wired. Whoever is making bank on Remilia, it's certainly not you. It serves to spam up your mindshare, attention economy, and social media news feed.

And yet, it's one of the biggest online entropic forces around, with at least hundreds of those cherubic little anime faces populating "dissident right" corners of Twitter.

Now when it comes down to all my criticism of it, I'm not saying that I have a principled stance against the Remilia Network, but rather that I'm not getting paid by it, and that they seem to spam up my feed. Perhaps others may choose to try and replicate their seeming social media success, but then again perhaps you'd need to be a Tech Magnate with standby AI content generating teams and click-contractors in order to make a financial grift disguised as an e-cult.

# orderedItems[].formerRepresentations.orderedItems[].source.content
The signature of the "Remilia Network" is that they will just broadcast and relay their messaging across each of their near-identical fumo-eque avis, in a sort of daisy chain of clout-boosting. What's interesting here is that they will relay seemingly whatever message content so long as it's from people within their audience, so for example they'll make a meme out of that they are just getting paid by Peter Thiel and then circulate it around.

The way that Remilia operates on social media feels to me like the canary in the coal mine of what we can expect ALL across social media in the future:

>underground digital economy NFT avis with little distinction between eachother
>minimal to no expressions of opinions online, only spreading cult images and terminology
>unapologetic and massive cult marketing efforts of the branding and its linkages with the financial component (the meme coin)
>an esoteric cult leader who is likely just an operator for the Thiel Network, who is the only one of the entire cult that expresses any commentary beyond memetic cult phrases

It's empty. It's disconnected. It's Cyberia and the Wired. Whoever is making bank on Remilia, it's certainly not you. It serves to spam up your mindshare, attention economy, and social media news feed.

And yet, it's one of the biggest online entropic forces around, with at least hundreds of those cherubic little anime faces populating "dissident right" corners of Twitter.

Now when it comes down to all my criticism of it, I'm not saying that I have a principled stance against the Remilia Network, but rather that I'm not getting paid by it, and that they seem to spam up my feed. Perhaps others may choose to try and replicate their seeming social media success, but then again perhaps you'd need to be a Tech Magnate with standby AI content generating teams and click-contractors in order to make a financial grift disguised as an e-cult.

# orderedItems[].source.content
The signature of the "Remilia Network" is that they will just broadcast and relay their messaging across each of their near-identical fumo-eque avis, in a sort of daisy chain of clout-boosting. What's interesting here is that they will relay seemingly whatever message content so long as it's from people within their audience, so for example they'll make a meme out of that they are just getting paid by Peter Thiel and then circulate it around.

The way that Remilia operates on social media feels to me like the canary in the coal mine of what we can expect ALL across social media in the future:

>underground digital economy NFT avis with little distinction between eachother
>minimal to no expressions of opinions online, only spreading cult images and terminology
>unapologetic and massive cult marketing efforts of the branding and its linkages with the financial component (the meme coin)
>an esoteric cult leader who is likely just an operator for the Thiel Network, who is the only one of the entire cult that expresses any commentary beyond memetic cult phrases

It's empty. It's disconnected. It's Cyberia and the Wired. Whoever is making bank on Remilia, it's certainly not you. It serves to spam up your mindshare, attention economy, and social media news feed.

And yet, it's one of the biggest online entropic forces around, with at least hundreds of those cherubic little anime faces populating "dissident right" corners of Twitter.

Now when it comes down to all my criticism of it, I'm not saying that I have a principled stance against the Remilia Network, but rather that I'm not getting paid by it, and that they seem to spam up my feed. Perhaps others may choose to try and replicate their seeming social media success, but then again perhaps you'd need to be a Tech Magnate with standby AI content generating teams and click-contractors in order to make a financial grift disguised as an e-cult.

# orderedItems[].content
I just finished the Fuentes v Fang discussion and I think it was actually a critical piece of discourse to assessing the political trajectory of the US in the next 20-50 years.

For starters, Fuentes got into it with deconstructing a portion of the Thiel network of influencers online, and how Thiel acts as the hidden hand in which Thiel himself is able to spread influence of his views and financial interests through the spokesmen of the effectively mercenary political groups of which he is covertly funding.

The discussion then moves into discussing various subjects within the public political discourse including the roles of influencer networks, doxxing, media, race, values, women, immigration, free speech, advertiser networks, innovation, and technology implementation within society.

There was a lot of good ground covered, and frankly, I agree with the position of Fuentes--that some have even gotten to before he had--regarding Thiel's influence network basically taking over America through secret smoky room, high society networking back channels that bleed onto social media. The Thielbux meme is probably real to a certain extent. For all we know, Fuentes may be getting Thielbux himself, in sort of a limited hangout type way.

The whole debate in general was reminiscent of the couple of immigration debates Fuentes held with Destiny a couple years ago (you can find them on Destiny's channel if you haven't seen them-- they're quite good). This feels like the next iteration of that where memesis has made "the relevant facts" apparent to both interlocutors, and so both Fuentes and Fang have a distinct conceptual understanding of where things stand amongst their individual and collective audiences.

In many ways, this felt like the culmination of sentiments that have built up between the "tech-right" and "the cultural right", where the "tech-right" believes a breakaway tech syndicates are the only way to get ahead, whereas the "cultural right" would have a greater interest in slowing, limiting, or sequester-subjugating technological innovation growth in order to not risk breaking the fabric of US society in general-- basically an accelerationism vs decelerationism difference of opinion. **(I know Fuentes isn't a representative of the complete concept of 'cultural right' as there's alot of different shades of it, but he does have a brand within that category)

For me, as much as I was pro-tech a number of years ago, at this point in time, I can see how tech oligarchy--if given full impunity--has the capability to basically take all of the money and force the government to strip every single right of US citizens.

The answer, therefore, for any given US citizen as far as I'm concerned is that perhaps this track may be probable, but whilst the US dollar still means something, you should acquire as much of it as you can so that you can defend yourself using the same tactics that the technocracy use so that you can stake your lot somewhere even if they use all kinds of money and corrupt politicians to break laws to try to take it from you. In this vein, I'm not against people developing local artistic movements or whatever to prevent soulless app tyranny enforced by law to only allot you 5 grains of rice and a smiley face.

All this to say, one should use the base resources they have to improve their financial position. Often times, there's alot of free, accessible resources that one can use to make quantum leaps. This is one of them. Social media in general can be a tool. Base technology like this can be used to carve away marketshare from even those with billions. Media is a powerful resource-- use it.

x.com/blyzedog/status/1885230853837500741?t=A152rEUMgm81bSk-9FTvdA&s=19

# orderedItems[].formerRepresentations.orderedItems[].content
I just finished the Fuentes v Fang discussion and I think it was actually a critical piece of discourse to assessing the political trajectory of the US in the next 20-50 years.

For starters, Fuentes got into it with deconstructing a portion of the Thiel network of influencers online, and how Thiel acts as the hidden hand in which Thiel himself is able to spread influence of his views and financial interests through the spokesmen of the effectively mercenary political groups of which he is covertly funding.

The discussion then moves into discussing various subjects within the public political discourse including the roles of influencer networks, doxxing, media, race, values, women, immigration, free speech, advertiser networks, innovation, and technology implementation within society.

There was a lot of good ground covered, and frankly, I agree with the position of Fuentes--that some have even gotten to before he had--regarding Thiel's influence network basically taking over America through secret smoky room, high society networking back channels that bleed onto social media. The Thielbux meme is probably real to a certain extent. For all we know, Fuentes may be getting Thielbux himself, in sort of a limited hangout type way.

The whole debate in general was reminiscent of the couple of immigration debates Fuentes held with Destiny a couple years ago (you can find them on Destiny's channel if you haven't seen them-- they're quite good). This feels like the next iteration of that where memesis has made "the relevant facts" apparent to both interlocutors, and so both Fuentes and Fang have a distinct conceptual understanding of where things stand amongst their individual and collective audiences.

In many ways, this felt like the culmination of sentiments that have built up between the "tech-right" and "the cultural right", where the "tech-right" believes a breakaway tech syndicates are the only way to get ahead, whereas the "cultural right" would have a greater interest in slowing, limiting, or sequester-subjugating technological innovation growth in order to not risk breaking the fabric of US society in general-- basically an accelerationism vs decelerationism difference of opinion. **(I know Fuentes isn't a representative of the complete concept of 'cultural right' as there's alot of different shades of it, but he does have a brand within it that category)

For me, as much as I was pro-tech a number of years ago, at this point in time, I can see how tech oligarchy--if given full impunity--has the capability to basically take all of the money and force the government to strip every single right of US citizens.

The answer, therefore, for any given US citizen as far as I'm concerned is that perhaps this track may be probable, but whilst the US dollar still means something, you should acquire as much of it as you can so that you can defend yourself using the same tactics that the technocracy use so that you can stake your lot somewhere even if they use all kinds of money and corrupt politicians to break laws to try to take it from you. In this vein, I'm not against people developing local artistic movements or whatever to prevent soulless app tyranny enforced by law to only allot you 5 grains of rice and a smiley face.

All this to say, one should use the base resources they have to improve their financial position. Often times, there's alot of free, accessible resources that one can use to make quantum leaps. This is one of them. Social media in general can be a tool. Base technology like this can be used to carve away marketshare from even those with billions. Media is a powerful resource-- use it.

x.com/blyzedog/status/1885230853837500741?t=A152rEUMgm81bSk-9FTvdA&s=19

# orderedItems[].formerRepresentations.orderedItems[].source.content
I just finished the Fuentes v Fang discussion and I think it was actually a critical piece of discourse to assessing the political trajectory of the US in the next 20-50 years.

For starters, Fuentes got into it with deconstructing a portion of the Thiel network of influencers online, and how Thiel acts as the hidden hand in which Thiel himself is able to spread influence of his views and financial interests through the spokesmen of the effectively mercenary political groups of which he is covertly funding.

The discussion then moves into discussing various subjects within the public political discourse including the roles of influencer networks, doxxing, media, race, values, women, immigration, free speech, advertiser networks, innovation, and technology implementation within society.

There was a lot of good ground covered, and frankly, I agree with the position of Fuentes--that some have even gotten to before he had--regarding Thiel's influence network basically taking over America through secret smoky room, high society networking back channels that bleed onto social media. The Thielbux meme is probably real to a certain extent. For all we know, Fuentes may be getting Thielbux himself, in sort of a limited hangout type way.

The whole debate in general was reminiscent of the couple of immigration debates Fuentes held with Destiny a couple years ago (you can find them on Destiny's channel if you haven't seen them-- they're quite good). This feels like the next iteration of that where memesis has made "the relevant facts" apparent to both interlocutors, and so both Fuentes and Fang have a distinct conceptual understanding of where things stand amongst their individual and collective audiences. 

In many ways, this felt like the culmination of sentiments that have built up between the "tech-right" and "the cultural right", where the "tech-right" believes a breakaway tech syndicates are the only way to get ahead, whereas the "cultural right" would have a greater interest in slowing, limiting, or sequester-subjugating technological innovation growth in order to not risk breaking the fabric of US society in general-- basically an accelerationism vs decelerationism difference of opinion. **(I know Fuentes isn't a representative of the complete concept of 'cultural right' as there's alot of different shades of it, but he does have a brand within it that category)

For me, as much as I was pro-tech a number of years ago, at this point in time, I can see how tech oligarchy--if given full impunity--has the capability to basically take all of the money and force the government to strip every single right of US citizens.

The answer, therefore, for any given US citizen as far as I'm concerned is that perhaps this track may be probable, but whilst the US dollar still means something, you should acquire as much of it as you can so that you can defend yourself using the same tactics that the technocracy use so that you can stake your lot somewhere even if they use all kinds of money and corrupt politicians to break laws to try to take it from you. In this vein, I'm not against people developing local artistic movements or whatever to prevent soulless app tyranny enforced by law to only allot you 5 grains of rice and a smiley face. 

All this to say, one should use the base resources they have to improve their financial position. Often times, there's alot of free, accessible resources that one can use to make quantum leaps. This is one of them. Social media in general can be a tool. Base technology like this can be used to carve away marketshare from even those with billions. Media is a powerful resource-- use it.

x.com/blyzedog/status/1885230853837500741?t=A152rEUMgm81bSk-9FTvdA&s=19

# orderedItems[].formerRepresentations.orderedItems[].content
I just finished the Fuentes v Fang discussion and I think it was actually a critical piece of discourse to assessing the political trajectory of the US in the next 20-50 years.

For starters, Fuentes got into it with deconstructing a portion of the Thiel network of influencers online, and how Thiel acts as the hidden hand in which Thiel himself is able to spread influence of his views and financial interests through the spokesmen of the effectively mercenary political groups of which he is covertly funding.

The discussion then moves into discussing various subjects within the public political discourse including the roles of influencer networks, doxxing, media, race, values, women, immigration, free speech, advertiser networks, innovation, and technology implementation within society.

There was a lot of good ground covered, and frankly, I agree with the position of Fuentes--that some have even gotten to before he had--regarding Thiel's influence network basically taking over America through secret smoky room, high society networking back channels that bleed onto social media. The Thielbux meme is probably real to a certain extent. For all we know, Fuentes may be getting Thielbux himself, in sort of a limited hangout type way.

The whole debate in general was reminiscent of the couple of immigration debates Fuentes held with Destiny a couple years ago (you can find them on Destiny's channel if you haven't seen them-- they're quite good). This feels like the next iteration of that where memesis has made "the relevant facts" apparent to both Interlocutors, and so both Fuentes and Fang have a distinct conceptual understanding of where things stand amongst their individual and collective audiences.

In many ways, this felt like the culmination of sentiments that have built up between the "tech-right" and "the cultural right", where the "tech-right" believes a breakaway tech syndicates are the only way to get ahead, whereas the "cultural right" would have a greater interest in slowing, limiting, or sequester-subjugating technological innovation growth in order to not risk breaking the fabric of US society in general-- basically an accelerationism vs decelerationism difference of opinion. **(I know Fuentes isn't a representative of the complete concept of 'cultural right' as there's alot of different shades of it, but he does have a brand within it that category)

For me, as much as I was pro-tech a number of years ago, at this point in time, I can see how tech oligarchy--if given full impunity--has the capability to basically take all of the money and force the government to strip every single right of US citizens.

The answer, therefore, for any given US citizen as far as I'm concerned is that perhaps this track may be probable, but whilst the US dollar still means something, you should acquire as much of it as you can so that you can defend yourself using the same tactics that the technocracy use so that you can stake your lot somewhere even if they use all kinds of money and corrupt politicians to break laws to try to take it from you. In this vein, I'm not against people developing local artistic movements or whatever to prevent soulless app tyranny enforced by law to only allot you 5 grains of rice and a smiley face.

All this to say, one should use the base resources they have to improve their financial position. Often times, there's alot of free, accessible resources that one can use to make quantum leaps. This is one of them. Social media in general can be a tool. Base technology like this can be used to carve away marketshare from even those with billions. Media is a powerful resource-- use it.

x.com/blyzedog/status/1885230853837500741?t=A152rEUMgm81bSk-9FTvdA&s=19

# orderedItems[].formerRepresentations.orderedItems[].source.content
I just finished the Fuentes v Fang discussion and I think it was actually a critical piece of discourse to assessing the political trajectory of the US in the next 20-50 years.

For starters, Fuentes got into it with deconstructing a portion of the Thiel network of influencers online, and how Thiel acts as the hidden hand in which Thiel himself is able to spread influence of his views and financial interests through the spokesmen of the effectively mercenary political groups of which he is covertly funding.

The discussion then moves into discussing various subjects within the public political discourse including the roles of influencer networks, doxxing, media, race, values, women, immigration, free speech, advertiser networks, innovation, and technology implementation within society.

There was a lot of good ground covered, and frankly, I agree with the position of Fuentes--that some have even gotten to before he had--regarding Thiel's influence network basically taking over America through secret smoky room, high society networking back channels that bleed onto social media. The Thielbux meme is probably real to a certain extent. For all we know, Fuentes may be getting Thielbux himself, in sort of a limited hangout type way.

The whole debate in general was reminiscent of the couple of immigration debates Fuentes held with Destiny a couple years ago (you can find them on Destiny's channel if you haven't seen them-- they're quite good). This feels like the next iteration of that where memesis has made "the relevant facts" apparent to both Interlocutors, and so both Fuentes and Fang have a distinct conceptual understanding of where things stand amongst their individual and collective audiences. 

In many ways, this felt like the culmination of sentiments that have built up between the "tech-right" and "the cultural right", where the "tech-right" believes a breakaway tech syndicates are the only way to get ahead, whereas the "cultural right" would have a greater interest in slowing, limiting, or sequester-subjugating technological innovation growth in order to not risk breaking the fabric of US society in general-- basically an accelerationism vs decelerationism difference of opinion. **(I know Fuentes isn't a representative of the complete concept of 'cultural right' as there's alot of different shades of it, but he does have a brand within it that category)

For me, as much as I was pro-tech a number of years ago, at this point in time, I can see how tech oligarchy--if given full impunity--has the capability to basically take all of the money and force the government to strip every single right of US citizens.

The answer, therefore, for any given US citizen as far as I'm concerned is that perhaps this track may be probable, but whilst the US dollar still means something, you should acquire as much of it as you can so that you can defend yourself using the same tactics that the technocracy use so that you can stake your lot somewhere even if they use all kinds of money and corrupt politicians to break laws to try to take it from you. In this vein, I'm not against people developing local artistic movements or whatever to prevent soulless app tyranny enforced by law to only allot you 5 grains of rice and a smiley face. 

All this to say, one should use the base resources they have to improve their financial position. Often times, there's alot of free, accessible resources that one can use to make quantum leaps. This is one of them. Social media in general can be a tool. Base technology like this can be used to carve away marketshare from even those with billions. Media is a powerful resource-- use it.

x.com/blyzedog/status/1885230853837500741?t=A152rEUMgm81bSk-9FTvdA&s=19

# orderedItems[].source.content
I just finished the Fuentes v Fang discussion and I think it was actually a critical piece of discourse to assessing the political trajectory of the US in the next 20-50 years.

For starters, Fuentes got into it with deconstructing a portion of the Thiel network of influencers online, and how Thiel acts as the hidden hand in which Thiel himself is able to spread influence of his views and financial interests through the spokesmen of the effectively mercenary political groups of which he is covertly funding.

The discussion then moves into discussing various subjects within the public political discourse including the roles of influencer networks, doxxing, media, race, values, women, immigration, free speech, advertiser networks, innovation, and technology implementation within society.

There was a lot of good ground covered, and frankly, I agree with the position of Fuentes--that some have even gotten to before he had--regarding Thiel's influence network basically taking over America through secret smoky room, high society networking back channels that bleed onto social media. The Thielbux meme is probably real to a certain extent. For all we know, Fuentes may be getting Thielbux himself, in sort of a limited hangout type way.

The whole debate in general was reminiscent of the couple of immigration debates Fuentes held with Destiny a couple years ago (you can find them on Destiny's channel if you haven't seen them-- they're quite good). This feels like the next iteration of that where memesis has made "the relevant facts" apparent to both interlocutors, and so both Fuentes and Fang have a distinct conceptual understanding of where things stand amongst their individual and collective audiences. 

In many ways, this felt like the culmination of sentiments that have built up between the "tech-right" and "the cultural right", where the "tech-right" believes a breakaway tech syndicates are the only way to get ahead, whereas the "cultural right" would have a greater interest in slowing, limiting, or sequester-subjugating technological innovation growth in order to not risk breaking the fabric of US society in general-- basically an accelerationism vs decelerationism difference of opinion. **(I know Fuentes isn't a representative of the complete concept of 'cultural right' as there's alot of different shades of it, but he does have a brand within that category)

For me, as much as I was pro-tech a number of years ago, at this point in time, I can see how tech oligarchy--if given full impunity--has the capability to basically take all of the money and force the government to strip every single right of US citizens.

The answer, therefore, for any given US citizen as far as I'm concerned is that perhaps this track may be probable, but whilst the US dollar still means something, you should acquire as much of it as you can so that you can defend yourself using the same tactics that the technocracy use so that you can stake your lot somewhere even if they use all kinds of money and corrupt politicians to break laws to try to take it from you. In this vein, I'm not against people developing local artistic movements or whatever to prevent soulless app tyranny enforced by law to only allot you 5 grains of rice and a smiley face. 

All this to say, one should use the base resources they have to improve their financial position. Often times, there's alot of free, accessible resources that one can use to make quantum leaps. This is one of them. Social media in general can be a tool. Base technology like this can be used to carve away marketshare from even those with billions. Media is a powerful resource-- use it.

x.com/blyzedog/status/1885230853837500741?t=A152rEUMgm81bSk-9FTvdA&s=19

# orderedItems[].content
These guys have stayed in the shadows for awhile, but I think it's worth bringing it out in the open now that we've seen their "power behind the throne" in light of finally being the force that had put Destiny on the backfoot, after so many had tried and failed to take down the reputation of the streamer in the decade and a half that he's risen in fame.

To give a brief analysis of the "drama" from my perspective:

Destiny had been streaming politics content for a good bit, and had found success in being hyperbolic on stream and using alot of language and body language that excites his viewers and inflames his anti-fans. Over time, Destiny was able to become increasingly niche as his audience grew, so he was able to cultivate larger anti-fan communities. Sometimes these anti-fan communities struck at him, but often times this actually empowered Destiny, as he just used it as content fuel to reinforce his streaming hegemony.

As time went on, and both Destiny and his anti-fans became more entrenched in their positions, the anti-fans realized that they needed to collectivize somewhat temporarily in order to take down Destiny. Destiny has been pretty familiarized with the Internet to this point though, having streamed on it for a number of years and being involved in online communities even longer, so he knew how to pre-empt and defuse a large number of attacks against him, and then Destiny would ultimately uncover the anti-fan conspiracy leader who lead the charge against him so that he could use his platform to "distance himself from them" and then utilize his own crop of online supporters to flood the ecosystem of the Internet arena in which all of this exists with "reputation takedowns" of the anti-fan leader in question so as to limit their ability to lead the charge against Destiny again. This largely worked in Destiny's favor, and even more so as time went on and his online supporters became more seasoned to clout wars, and Destiny's overall online intelligence and counter-intelligence network grew.

However, Destiny has maintained some weaknesses to his overall platform that he hasn't been able to entirely mitigate. Namely, perhaps the biggest one that I've noticed is that in drama spaces which hold philosophical worldviews that are distinctly different from his own, his anti-fan community is able to coalesce easier.

The biggest place for this that I have encountered where this holds true is the Destiny thread on Kiwifarms. Here, Destiny's anti-fans are particularly no-holds-barred with their commentary on Destiny-- ranging anywhere from constructive criticism TO pithy jokes at Destiny's expense TO bad faith mischaracterizations against his character and intentions TO downright seeming vendettas & resentment against Destiny himself. Destiny is somewhat helpless against this constant stream of obsessive commentary that watches his every on-stream move, looking for the next slip-up to potentially blow up as the next "scandal". Sure, he may have a few fans of his that slip onto the forum and covertly lobby and spread some level of Destiny's "soft power" against the endless waves of criticism, but often times even mild pro-Destiny sentiment tends to get weeded out rather quickly.

The Destiny anti-fan community of Kiwifarm is critical in discussing the recent, at least, semi-successful character assassination of Destiny through the recent drama/scandal/controversy because it really served as the foundational layer and the linchpin from which the public PR move against Destiny was able to even come about in the first place.

Without Kiwifarms there would've been no muster and no coalition.

But Kiwifarms did exist, and so there existed both a will and a group of people that were able to operatively collectivize against him.

So with 'the will', it exists suspended in a state of ceaseless obsession toward seemingly taking Destiny down as a streamer, or at least (in some cases) down a few pegs so that he can reckon with some of his own philosophical inconsistencies. So long as Destiny's thread remains highly active, which it has been, this collective will maintains within the context of the thread and for those who frequent it and agree with what is said there.

But to the people who would collectivize against him, who would really be the one to lead the effort to make this happen, and why?

The answer to this lies once again with Kiwifarms, but this gets into a new phenomena that has developed in recent years as "e-drama" has become more mainstream. Knowing that previous attempts to "dethrone the politics streaming content king" have left behind a trail of proverbial bodies of people who thought they had what it takes to be the 'ultimate rebel barbarian king anti-fan' and failed, the individual(s) who this time have launched the assault were those that were not only familiar with the value of Kiwifarms as a resource to meet this end, but also in understanding the nature of cross-platform narrative control and having their own platforms established first.

The short-list of some of the lead culprits for this particular attempted clout takedown against Destiny were Nicholas DeOrio, Chud Logic, and Turkey Tom, with Null-- owner-operator of Kiwifarms-- also having played a role, perhaps even more than what is publicly discussed.

Why this entire drama is important is because it puts in full view a better context of the inevitable bubbling up of the undercurrent of anti-fans that will tend to proliferate on Kiwifarms, as well as on Reddit snark subreddits and comment sections (albeit generally in more mitigated ways) for any streamer that reaches a certain size and where their public online conduct can be chimpclipped to potentially "rein them in" through series of lawsuits against them.

Essentially, to be a large successful "drama" or "politics" streamer, you will at some point be 'put in your place' by the law, whether it is a just law and set of legal proceedings or not.

Therefore, in light of this, one would need to decide in becoming a streamer, what path they would like to take. They can either be:

A) A diluted, cookie-cutter "drama" streamer that tricks their audience into always supporting the narrative that is 100% in accordance with the law at all times. Lawtubers themselves tend to have an easier and more profitable go at this than your generic late night video game overlay streamer.
B) A streamer who comments on drama at times but with which it is either a small part of the overall brand, or otherwise isn't related to the engagement of the channel itself. As well, people who don't really care about the metrics with regard to the channel can also choose this route.
C) A streamer who basically writes off "public zeitgeist" drama and simply engages in niche content that is highly technical, whereupon they can choose to spawn a culture of insular drama in their own (somewhat) cordoned off community at a level that they feel comfortable with.

And now while I would've liked to have ended there, I think it's worth getting into a little bit about this new online paradigm as we've seen it so far concerning this prevailing drama ecosystem that exists that has seemingly at least rattled Destiny, but perhaps has actually dislodged him from his prominence in some way as well.

Nicholas DeOrio seems to have been the pointman, or certainly at least the buttonman, when it came to the recent effort to take Destiny down. Turkey Tom came in support of his narrative. As did the more BreadTube/lefty-politics-aligned President Sunday and Chud Logic. What's characteristic of all of the people here are a couple of things:

1) They all understand Destiny's content with regard to his audience, thus recognizing the general interests of the audience.
2) They all saw value in Destiny losing some audience capture and some reputational damage, much to their benefit.
3) They all have platforms and understand the value of platforms and cross-platform discussion with regards to audience capture.
4) They all understand the value of Kiwifarms with regard to being a useful resource in launching an anti-fan campaign to meet their goals in carving up a portion of the bigger streamers' market share.

These items taken together serve as a deadly combination with which Destiny was left taken aback for the first time in a long time, if perhaps ever, as far as his streaming career was concerned.

Since it seemed to have a certain level of success, I expect this model of understanding to exist and expand toward taking down other public figures / influencers in the online "marketplace of ideas" in the future.

For future streamers, therefore, it is incumbent on you to cross your 't's and dot your 'i's on all things as far as your public presentation is concerned, because the amount of scrutiny and conversation surrounding you is only set to increase.

# orderedItems[].source.content
These guys have stayed in the shadows for awhile, but I think it's worth bringing it out in the open now that we've seen their "power behind the throne" in light of finally being the force that had put Destiny on the backfoot, after so many had tried and failed to take down the reputation of the streamer in the decade and a half that he's risen in fame.

To give a brief analysis of the "drama" from my perspective:

Destiny had been streaming politics content for a good bit, and had found success in being hyperbolic on stream and using alot of language and body language that excites his viewers and inflames his anti-fans. Over time, Destiny was able to become increasingly niche as his audience grew, so he was able to cultivate larger anti-fan communities. Sometimes these anti-fan communities struck at him, but often times this actually empowered Destiny, as he just used it as content fuel to reinforce his streaming hegemony.

As time went on, and both Destiny and his anti-fans became more entrenched in their positions, the anti-fans realized that they needed to collectivize somewhat temporarily in order to take down Destiny. Destiny has been pretty familiarized with the Internet to this point though, having streamed on it for a number of years and being involved in online communities even longer, so he knew how to pre-empt and defuse a large number of attacks against him, and then Destiny would ultimately uncover the anti-fan conspiracy leader who lead the charge against him so that he could use his platform to "distance himself from them" and then utilize his own crop of online supporters to flood the ecosystem of the Internet arena in which all of this exists with "reputation takedowns" of the anti-fan leader in question so as to limit their ability to lead the charge against Destiny again. This largely worked in Destiny's favor, and even more so as time went on and his online supporters became more seasoned to clout wars, and Destiny's overall online intelligence and counter-intelligence network grew.

However, Destiny has maintained some weaknesses to his overall platform that he hasn't been able to entirely mitigate. Namely, perhaps the biggest one that I've noticed is that in drama spaces which hold philosophical worldviews that are distinctly different from his own, his anti-fan community is able to coalesce easier. 

The biggest place for this that I have encountered where this holds true is the Destiny thread on Kiwifarms. Here, Destiny's anti-fans are particularly no-holds-barred with their commentary on Destiny-- ranging anywhere from constructive criticism TO pithy jokes at Destiny's expense TO bad faith mischaracterizations against his character and intentions TO downright seeming vendettas & resentment against Destiny himself. Destiny is somewhat helpless against this constant stream of obsessive commentary that watches his every on-stream move, looking for the next slip-up to potentially blow up as the next "scandal". Sure, he may have a few fans of his that slip onto the forum and covertly lobby and spread some level of Destiny's "soft power" against the endless waves of criticism, but often times even mild pro-Destiny sentiment tends to get weeded out rather quickly.

The Destiny anti-fan community of Kiwifarm is critical in discussing the recent, at least, semi-successful character assassination of Destiny through the recent drama/scandal/controversy because it really served as the foundational layer and the linchpin from which the public PR move against Destiny was able to even come about in the first place.

Without Kiwifarms there would've been no muster and no coalition.

But Kiwifarms did exist, and so there existed both a will and a group of people that were able to operatively collectivize against him.

So with 'the will', it exists suspended in a state of ceaseless obsession toward seemingly taking Destiny down as a streamer, or at least (in some cases) down a few pegs so that he can reckon with some of his own philosophical inconsistencies. So long as Destiny's thread remains highly active, which it has been, this collective will maintains within the context of the thread and for those who frequent it and agree with what is said there.

But to the people who would collectivize against him, who would really be the one to lead the effort to make this happen, and why?

The answer to this lies once again with Kiwifarms, but this gets into a new phenomena that has developed in recent years as "e-drama" has become more mainstream. Knowing that previous attempts to "dethrone the politics streaming content king" have left behind a trail of proverbial bodies of people who thought they had what it takes to be the 'ultimate rebel barbarian king anti-fan' and failed, the individual(s) who this time have launched the assault were those that were not only familiar with the value of Kiwifarms as a resource to meet this end, but also in understanding the nature of cross-platform narrative control and having their own platforms established first.

The short-list of some of the lead culprits for this particular attempted clout takedown against Destiny were Nicholas DeOrio, Chud Logic, and Turkey Tom, with Null-- owner-operator of Kiwifarms-- also having played a role, perhaps even more than what is publicly discussed.

Why this entire drama is important is because it puts in full view a better context of the inevitable bubbling up of the undercurrent of anti-fans that will tend to proliferate on Kiwifarms, as well as on Reddit snark subreddits and comment sections (albeit generally in more mitigated ways) for any streamer that reaches a certain size and where their public online conduct can be chimpclipped to potentially "rein them in" through series of lawsuits against them.

Essentially, to be a large successful "drama" or "politics" streamer, you will at some point be 'put in your place' by the law, whether it is a just law and set of legal proceedings or not.

Therefore, in light of this, one would need to decide in becoming a streamer, what path they would like to take. They can either be:

A) A diluted, cookie-cutter "drama" streamer that tricks their audience into always supporting the narrative that is 100% in accordance with the law at all times. Lawtubers themselves tend to have an easier and more profitable go at this than your generic late night video game overlay streamer.
B) A streamer who comments on drama at times but with which it is either a small part of the overall brand, or otherwise isn't related to the engagement of the channel itself. As well, people who don't really care about the metrics with regard to the channel can also choose this route.
C) A streamer who basically writes off "public zeitgeist" drama and simply engages in niche content that is highly technical, whereupon they can choose to spawn a culture of insular drama in their own (somewhat) cordoned off community at a level that they feel comfortable with.

And now while I would've liked to have ended there, I think it's worth getting into a little bit about this new online paradigm as we've seen it so far concerning this prevailing drama ecosystem that exists that has seemingly at least rattled Destiny, but perhaps has actually dislodged him from his prominence in some way as well.

Nicholas DeOrio seems to have been the pointman, or certainly at least the buttonman, when it came to the recent effort to take Destiny down. Turkey Tom came in support of his narrative. As did the more BreadTube/lefty-politics-aligned President Sunday and Chud Logic. What's characteristic of all of the people here are a couple of things:

1) They all understand Destiny's content with regard to his audience, thus recognizing the general interests of the audience.
2) They all saw value in Destiny losing some audience capture and some reputational damage, much to their benefit.
3) They all have platforms and understand the value of platforms and cross-platform discussion with regards to audience capture.
4) They all understand the value of Kiwifarms with regard to being a useful resource in launching an anti-fan campaign to meet their goals in carving up a portion of the bigger streamers' market share.

These items taken together serve as a deadly combination with which Destiny was left taken aback for the first time in a long time, if perhaps ever, as far as his streaming career was concerned.

Since it seemed to have a certain level of success, I expect this model of understanding to exist and expand toward taking down other public figures / influencers in the online "marketplace of ideas" in the future. 

For future streamers, therefore, it is incumbent on you to cross your 't's and dot your 'i's on all things as far as your public presentation is concerned, because the amount of scrutiny and conversation surrounding you is only set to increase.

# orderedItems[].content
According to this piece, the current world order is based off a system of blackmail of world leaders so that none of them resorts to such a level of tribalism that they start launching nukes.

To maintain this system, they brainwash the population to perceive somewhat false realities, using the tactics of cults such as NXIVM, which itself had its methodology derived from Maoist China and that which was learned/applied by military intelligence during the Korean War.

Very good read. Highly recommend.

https://cultstate.com/2018/07/30/What-Is-A-Cult-State/

# orderedItems[].source.content
According to this piece, the current world order is based off a system of blackmail of world leaders so that none of them resorts to such a level of tribalism that they start launching nukes.

To maintain this system, they brainwash the population to perceive somewhat false realities, using the tactics of cults such as NXIVM, which itself had its methodology derived from Maoist China and that which was learned/applied by military intelligence during the Korean War.

Very good read. Highly recommend.

https://cultstate.com/2018/07/30/What-Is-A-Cult-State/

# orderedItems[].content
The state of WV is trying to rape Timcast so he's leaving.

The law in question is basically forcing businesses in WV to hire only employees and not contractors. The issue with this is that anyone who is brought on to do work for Timcast must be insured under Timcast, no matter how small their contract gig is. For Timcast to hire someone, the employees have to effectively register as businesses themselves and show licensure that they are able to do the job.

He's saying that his lawyer is telling him that these laws are popping up all over the country, but because most citizens are involved in their day-to-day, they aren't paying attention to it.

It's been implemented in California with AB5, and a quick Google search told me that New Jersey, New York, and Illinois are considering it as well.

Tim framed this as an Agenda 2030 law designed to demolish smaller, non-corporate behemoth businesses and redirect the laid off workers to go work at Walmart, and I'm inclined to agree. Fuck this law.

https://youtu.be/SUwMB3U2fII?si=liBUzPpQ9sP-tZFm

# orderedItems[].source.content
The state of WV is trying to rape Timcast so he's leaving.

The law in question is basically forcing businesses in WV to hire only employees and not contractors. The issue with this is that anyone who is brought on to do work for Timcast must be insured under Timcast, no matter how small their contract gig is. For Timcast to hire someone, the employees have to effectively register as businesses themselves and show licensure that they are able to do the job.

He's saying that his lawyer is telling him that these laws are popping up all over the country, but because most citizens are involved in their day-to-day, they aren't paying attention to it. 

It's been implemented in California with AB5, and a quick Google search told me that New Jersey, New York, and Illinois are considering it as well.

Tim framed this as an Agenda 2030 law designed to demolish smaller, non-corporate behemoth businesses and redirect the laid off workers to go work at Walmart, and I'm inclined to agree. Fuck this law. 

https://youtu.be/SUwMB3U2fII?si=liBUzPpQ9sP-tZFm

# orderedItems[].summary
Timcast Leaving WV Because Agenda 2030 Labor Law

# orderedItems[].content
KFer finding out the hard way about the policy that China and Singapore (maybe other Asian countries as well, idk) has had for multiple years now about congestion prices.

You're getting mad about having to pay more for higher parking space rates and the newly-installed congestion pricing?

Guess what? For the elites trying to fuck you over, that's the whole point.

Expect them to implement more of this kind of thing in the future to the point where you can't go anywhere without paying like $50.

Make more money or somehow convince the people in charge of implementing the policy to not implement it. Those are your options to prevent it from being implemented further.

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/not-just-bikes-r-fuckcars-urbanists-new-urbanism-car-free-anti-car.127069/page-613#post-20420154

# orderedItems[].formerRepresentations.orderedItems[].content
KFer finding out the hard way about the policy that China and Singapore (maybe other Asian countries as well, idk) has had for multiple years now about congestion prices.

You're getting mad about having to pay more for higher parking space rates and the newly-installed congestion pricing?

Guess what? For the elites trying to fuck you over, that's the whole point.

Expect them to implement more of this kind of thing in the future to the point where you can't pay to go anywhere without paying like $50.

Make more money or somehow convince the people in charge of implementing the policy to not implement it. Those are your options to prevent it from being implemented further.

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/not-just-bikes-r-fuckcars-urbanists-new-urbanism-car-free-anti-car.127069/page-613#post-20420154

# orderedItems[].formerRepresentations.orderedItems[].source.content
KFer finding out the hard way about the policy that China and Singapore (maybe other Asian countries as well, idk) has had for multiple years now about congestion prices.

You're getting mad about having to pay more for higher parking space rates and the newly-installed congestion pricing?

Guess what? For the elites trying to fuck you over, that's the whole point. 

Expect them to implement more of this kind of thing in the future to the point where you can't pay to go anywhere without paying like $50.

Make more money or somehow convince the people in charge of implementing the policy to not implement it. Those are your options to prevent it from being implemented further.

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/not-just-bikes-r-fuckcars-urbanists-new-urbanism-car-free-anti-car.127069/page-613#post-20420154

# orderedItems[].formerRepresentations.orderedItems[].summary
Kiwifarmer On New Congestion Pricing Policy

# orderedItems[].source.content
KFer finding out the hard way about the policy that China and Singapore (maybe other Asian countries as well, idk) has had for multiple years now about congestion prices.

You're getting mad about having to pay more for higher parking space rates and the newly-installed congestion pricing?

Guess what? For the elites trying to fuck you over, that's the whole point. 

Expect them to implement more of this kind of thing in the future to the point where you can't go anywhere without paying like $50.

Make more money or somehow convince the people in charge of implementing the policy to not implement it. Those are your options to prevent it from being implemented further.

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/not-just-bikes-r-fuckcars-urbanists-new-urbanism-car-free-anti-car.127069/page-613#post-20420154

# orderedItems[].summary
Kiwifarmer On New Congestion Pricing Policy

# orderedItems[].content
@grey @randbot I've sort of come at it from a slightly different perspective in that these people have been exposed to this side of the Internet but have also tard-wrangled a whole bunch of viewers.

To me it was a bit of a project the past couple years or so to figure out what the deal was with that, and look through the layers of their whole ordeal to see how they've been making it work.

The fact that sites like Kiwifarms exist really serve as a place where all the 'content creator' receipts get kept, so it's like in the first place, if you're a streamer and you've got some skeletons in your closet, you've gotta be pretty good at what you do, and also there's basically a timer set where if you do crazy shit, that's eventually gonna catch up with you when others feel like they can pounce on you by making video essays about "your fall" all at once.

It feels like the trend has been that these people either end up retiring because their monetization dries up, they troon out for content (at which point, anyone that's not a hypnotized normie will drop them immediately), or all the remaining ones end up fighting with eachother until there's only one or two left.

When they're all done and they've doxxed and swatted eachother off the Internet, at that point the most hardened dramatuber will be the one that has all the audience and will likely serve as the regime and/or corporate mouthpieces.

My money is that Null will probably be the one to take up that mantle, especially when the more normie-friendly mainstream people start fading into the background because even normies stop believing what they're selling (eg Donald Trump, Elon Musk, Bill Ackman etc etc).

# orderedItems[].source.content
@grey@poa.st @randbot@poa.st I've sort of come at it from a slightly different perspective in that these people have been exposed to this side of the Internet but have also tard-wrangled a whole bunch of viewers.

To me it was a bit of a project the past couple years or so to figure out what the deal was with that, and look through the layers of their whole ordeal to see how they've been making it work. 

The fact that sites like Kiwifarms exist really serve as a place where all the 'content creator' receipts get kept, so it's like in the first place, if you're a streamer and you've got some skeletons in your closet, you've gotta be pretty good at what you do, and also there's basically a timer set where if you do crazy shit, that's eventually gonna catch up with you when others feel like they can pounce on you by making video essays about "your fall" all at once.

It feels like the trend has been that these people either end up retiring because their monetization dries up, they troon out for content (at which point, anyone that's not a hypnotized normie will drop them immediately), or all the remaining ones end up fighting with eachother until there's only one or two left.

When they're all done and they've doxxed and swatted eachother off the Internet, at that point the most hardened dramatuber will be the one that has all the audience and will likely serve as the regime and/or corporate mouthpieces. 

My money is that Null will probably be the one to take up that mantle, especially when the more normie-friendly mainstream people start fading into the background because even normies stop believing what they're selling (eg Donald Trump, Elon Musk, Bill Ackman etc etc).

# orderedItems[].content
In light of the recent Destiny drama or whatever where his orbiter streamer e-girl is looking to collect $1M from him to pay for her law school, and all of the other Destiny orbiters snaked on Destiny, I feel like the best thing to say about the situation is this:

This is a cautionary tale of how you can only go so far online by "debatebroing" people in an "ends-justify-the-means" Machiavellian tactics kind of way without 1) making some actual friends; and 2) learning the ironclad rules about operating socially and keeping your money and reputation in tact.

Destiny thought brute-forcing his way through every conversation was enough "to win", but, in doing so, he's collected an ever-growing portion of his audience and "community" who feel jilted in some way and otherwise harbor some resentment for him. Maybe all of these current headwinds he's experiencing will come to pass, but it may also be that they don't, and it may come to the point where "the haters" will come to strip everything he has from him through very real big boy lawsuits.

Maybe I'm wrong here and this moment in time is just a passing one for Destiny, but the amount of uproar about this whole affair in the tangential online spaces that discuss Destiny and the greater e-celeb world lead me to believe that this may be the beginning of the end of Destiny's reign as the leading "free speech warrior of the people" in the online politics arena, and this may indeed be the killshot that forces him out of the "virality arena", to instead be relegated to a future of Internet irrelevance, serving to only captivate Cable TV boomers with tired and advertiser-friendly takes pre-constructed for him by whoever his future right-wing talk show handlers' writing room designates.

Lessons to learn from this for anyone who would ever have an interest in expressing opinions online for money in a meaningful way:

1) Don't be a retarded shitlib.
2) Own what you say.
3) Don't have women, and especially a slew of women, be a part of your associated act online.
4) Don't engage in the types of content online where you think you control the narrative but you kind of actually don't, and where things can boil over and get out of hand pretty quickly.

I've actually been very impressed in reviewing Destiny content the past few years of how he can actually defend any position / make about any argument very well. People won't usually give him this credit, but I will. He uses slimeball tactics to get there, but he gets the job done, and can hypnotize any midwit probably even better than any mainstream alternative.

I've also been impressed with how he does just brute-force his way through spots where many others would've given up or issued empty online apologies and all that. There is a certain level of respect given to just the unapologetic grit and honesty of just marching through and humiliating your opposition through a well-placed snarky one-liner.

But you can't debatebro the judge, and at this point, I think Destiny is being forced to confront that reality.

Assuming this whole affair was real and not some kind of coordinated cloutfest by all parties involved (which it certainly well may still be-- we don't know for certain), this is a good time to reflect on how what you say online can be permanent and DOES NOT read back as well from a biased prosecutor in a court of law as it did when you feverishly spat it out in verbal or text format online to get an "own" by potentially compromising your reputation or making yourself vulnerable to attack later on if an opportunistic a-log wanted to take you on down the line.

All this to say, the Internet is a place where you CAN express your thoughts well and you CAN make a shit ton of money, but every action has at least one vulnerability, so you better learn to shore those up, or otherwise the day will come where others are going to see you as a fat pile of cash to take from. Destiny may be finding this out presently.

# orderedItems[].formerRepresentations.orderedItems[].content
In light of the recent Destiny drama or whatever where his orbiter streamer e-girl is looking to collect $1M from him to pay for her law school, and all of the other Destiny orbiters snaked on Destiny, I feel like the best thing to say about the situation is this:

This is a cautionary tale of how you can only go so far online by "debatebroing" people in an "ends-justify-the-means" Machiavellian tactics kind of way without 1) making some actual friends; and 2) learning the ironclad rules about operating socially and keeping your money and reputation in tact.

Destiny thought brute-forcing his way through every conversation was enough "to win", but, in doing so, he's collected an ever-growing portion of his audience and "community" who feel jilted in some way and otherwise harbor some resentment for him. Maybe all of these current headwinds he's experiencing will come to pass, but it may also be that they don't, and it may come to the point where "the haters" will come to strip everything he has from him through very real big boy lawsuits.

Maybe I'm wrong here and this moment in time is just a passing one for Destiny, but the amount of uproar about this whole affair in the tangential online spaces that discuss Destiny and the greater e-celeb world lead me to believe that this may be the beginning of the end of Destiny's reign as the leading "free speech warrior of the people" in the online politics arena, and this may indeed be the killshot that forces him out of the "virality arena", to instead be relegated to a future of Internet irrelevance, serving to only captivate Cable TV boomers with tired and advertiser-friendly takes pre-constructed for him by whoever his future right-wing talk show handlers' writing room designates.

Lessons to learn from this for anyone who would ever have an interest in expressing opinions online for money in a meaningful way:

1) Don't be a retarded shitlib.
2) Own what you say.
3) Don't have women, and especially a slew of women, be a part of your associated act online.
4) Don't engage in the types of content online where you think you control the narrative but you kind of actually don't, and where things can boil over and get out of hand pretty quickly.

I've actually been very impressed in reviewing Destiny content the past few years of how he can actually defend any position / make about any argument very well. People won't usually give him this credit, but I will. He uses slimeball tactics to get there, but he gets the job done, and can hypnotize any midwit probably better than even than any mainstream alternative.

I've also been impressed with how he does just brute-force his way through spots where many others would've given up or issued empty online apologies and all that. There is a certain level of respect given to just the unapologetic grit and honesty of just marching through and humiliating your opposition through a well-placed snarky one-liner.

But you can't debatebro the judge, and at this point, I think Destiny is being forced to confront that reality.

Assuming this whole affair was real and not some kind of coordinated cloutfest by all parties involved (which it certainly well may still be-- we don't know for certain), this is a good time to reflect on how what you say online can be permanent and DOES NOT read back as well from a biased prosecutor in a court of law as it did when you feverishly spat it out in verbal or text format online to get an "own" by potentially compromising your reputation or making yourself vulnerable to attack later on if an opportunistic a-log wanted to take you on down the line.

All this to say, the Internet is a place where you CAN express your thoughts well and you CAN make a shit ton of money, but every action has at least one vulnerability, so you better learn to shore those up, or otherwise the day will come where others are going to see you as a fat pile of cash to take from. Destiny may be finding this out presently.

# orderedItems[].formerRepresentations.orderedItems[].source.content
In light of the recent Destiny drama or whatever where his orbiter streamer e-girl is looking to collect $1M from him to pay for her law school, and all of the other Destiny orbiters snaked on Destiny, I feel like the best thing to say about the situation is this:

This is a cautionary tale of how you can only go so far online by "debatebroing" people in an "ends-justify-the-means" Machiavellian tactics kind of way without 1) making some actual friends; and 2) learning the ironclad rules about operating socially and keeping your money and reputation in tact.

Destiny thought brute-forcing his way through every conversation was enough "to win", but, in doing so, he's collected an ever-growing portion of his audience and "community" who feel jilted in some way and otherwise harbor some resentment for him. Maybe all of these current headwinds he's experiencing will come to pass, but it may also be that they don't, and it may come to the point where "the haters" will come to strip everything he has from him through very real big boy lawsuits.

Maybe I'm wrong here and this moment in time is just a passing one for Destiny, but the amount of uproar about this whole affair in the tangential online spaces that discuss Destiny and the greater e-celeb world lead me to believe that this may be the beginning of the end of Destiny's reign as the leading "free speech warrior of the people" in the online politics arena, and this may indeed be the killshot that forces him out of the "virality arena", to instead be relegated to a future of Internet irrelevance, serving to only captivate Cable TV boomers with tired and advertiser-friendly takes pre-constructed for him by whoever his future right-wing talk show handlers' writing room designates.

Lessons to learn from this for anyone who would ever have an interest in expressing opinions online for money in a meaningful way:

1) Don't be a retarded shitlib.
2) Own what you say.
3) Don't have women, and especially a slew of women, be a part of your associated act online.
4) Don't engage in the types of content online where you think you control the narrative but you kind of actually don't, and where things can boil over and get out of hand pretty quickly.

I've actually been very impressed in reviewing Destiny content the past few years of how he can actually defend any position / make about any argument very well. People won't usually give him this credit, but I will. He uses slimeball tactics to get there, but he gets the job done, and can hypnotize any midwit probably better than even than any mainstream alternative. 

I've also been impressed with how he does just brute-force his way through spots where many others would've given up or issued empty online apologies and all that. There is a certain level of respect given to just the unapologetic grit and honesty of just marching through and humiliating your opposition through a well-placed snarky one-liner.

But you can't debatebro the judge, and at this point, I think Destiny is being forced to confront that reality. 

Assuming this whole affair was real and not some kind of coordinated cloutfest by all parties involved (which it certainly well may still be-- we don't know for certain), this is a good time to reflect on how what you say online can be permanent and DOES NOT read back as well from a biased prosecutor in a court of law as it did when you feverishly spat it out in verbal or text format online to get an "own" by potentially compromising your reputation or making yourself vulnerable to attack later on if an opportunistic a-log wanted to take you on down the line.

All this to say, the Internet is a place where you CAN express your thoughts well and you CAN make a shit ton of money, but every action has at least one vulnerability, so you better learn to shore those up, or otherwise the day will come where others are going to see you as a fat pile of cash to take from. Destiny may be finding this out presently.

# orderedItems[].formerRepresentations.orderedItems[].content
In light of the recent Destiny drama or whatever where his orbiter streamer e-girl is looking to collect $1M from him to pay for her law school, and all of the other Destiny orbiters snaked on Destiny, I feel like the best thing to say about the situation is this:

This is a cautionary tale of how you can only go so far online by "debatebroing" people in an "ends-justify-the-means" Machiavellian tactics kind of way without 1) making some actual friends; and 2) learning the ironclad rules about operating socially and keeping your money and reputation in tact.

Destiny thought brute-forcing his way through every conversation was enough "to win", but, in doing so, he's collected an ever-growing portion of his audience and "community" who feel jilted in some way and otherwise harbor some resentment for him. Maybe all of these current headwinds he's experiencing will come to pass, but it may also be that they don't, and it may come to the point where "the haters" will come to strip everything he has from him through very real big boy lawsuits.

Maybe I'm wrong here and this moment in time is just a passing one for Destiny, but the amount of uproar about this whole affair in the tangential online spaces that discuss Destiny and the greater e-celeb world lead me to believe that this may be the beginning of the end of Destiny's reign as the leading "free speech warrior of the people" in the online politics arena, and this may indeed be the killshot that forces him out of the "virality arena", to instead be relegated to a future of Internet irrelevance, serving to only captivate Cable TV boomers with tired and advertiser-friendly takes pre-constructed for him by whoever his future right-wing talk show handlers' writing room designates.

Lessons to learn from this for anyone who would ever have an interest in expressing opinions online for money in a meaningful way:

1) Don't be a retarded shitlib.
2) Own what you say.
3) Don't have women, and especially a slew of women, be a part of your associated act online.
4) Don't engage in the types of content online where you think you control the narrative but you kind of actually don't, and where things get boil over and get out of hand pretty quickly.

I've actually been very impressed in reviewing Destiny content the past few years of how he can actually defend any position / make about any argument very well. People won't usually give him this credit, but I will. He uses slimeball tactics to get there, but he gets the job done, and can hypnotize any midwit probably better than even than any mainstream alternative.

I've also been impressed with how he does just brute-force his way through spots where many others would've given up or issued empty online apologies and all that. There is a certain level of respect given to just the unapologetic grit and honesty of just marching through and humiliating your opposition through a well-placed snarky one-liner.

But you can't debatebro the judge, and at this point, I think Destiny is being forced to confront that reality.

Assuming this whole affair was real and not some kind of coordinated cloutfest by all parties involved (which it certainly well may still be-- we don't know for certain), this is a good time to reflect on how what you say online can be permanent and DOES NOT read back as well from a biased prosecutor in a court of law as it did when you feverishly spat it out in verbal or text format online to get an "own" by potentially compromising your reputation or making yourself vulnerable to attack later on if an opportunistic a-log wanted to take you on down the line.

All this to say, the Internet is a place where you CAN express your thoughts well and you CAN make a shit ton of money, but every action has at least one vulnerability, so you better learn to shore those up, or otherwise the day will come where others are going to see you as a fat pile of cash to take from. Destiny may be finding this out presently.

# orderedItems[].formerRepresentations.orderedItems[].source.content
In light of the recent Destiny drama or whatever where his orbiter streamer e-girl is looking to collect $1M from him to pay for her law school, and all of the other Destiny orbiters snaked on Destiny, I feel like the best thing to say about the situation is this:

This is a cautionary tale of how you can only go so far online by "debatebroing" people in an "ends-justify-the-means" Machiavellian tactics kind of way without 1) making some actual friends; and 2) learning the ironclad rules about operating socially and keeping your money and reputation in tact.

Destiny thought brute-forcing his way through every conversation was enough "to win", but, in doing so, he's collected an ever-growing portion of his audience and "community" who feel jilted in some way and otherwise harbor some resentment for him. Maybe all of these current headwinds he's experiencing will come to pass, but it may also be that they don't, and it may come to the point where "the haters" will come to strip everything he has from him through very real big boy lawsuits.

Maybe I'm wrong here and this moment in time is just a passing one for Destiny, but the amount of uproar about this whole affair in the tangential online spaces that discuss Destiny and the greater e-celeb world lead me to believe that this may be the beginning of the end of Destiny's reign as the leading "free speech warrior of the people" in the online politics arena, and this may indeed be the killshot that forces him out of the "virality arena", to instead be relegated to a future of Internet irrelevance, serving to only captivate Cable TV boomers with tired and advertiser-friendly takes pre-constructed for him by whoever his future right-wing talk show handlers' writing room designates.

Lessons to learn from this for anyone who would ever have an interest in expressing opinions online for money in a meaningful way:

1) Don't be a retarded shitlib.
2) Own what you say.
3) Don't have women, and especially a slew of women, be a part of your associated act online.
4) Don't engage in the types of content online where you think you control the narrative but you kind of actually don't, and where things get boil over and get out of hand pretty quickly.

I've actually been very impressed in reviewing Destiny content the past few years of how he can actually defend any position / make about any argument very well. People won't usually give him this credit, but I will. He uses slimeball tactics to get there, but he gets the job done, and can hypnotize any midwit probably better than even than any mainstream alternative. 

I've also been impressed with how he does just brute-force his way through spots where many others would've given up or issued empty online apologies and all that. There is a certain level of respect given to just the unapologetic grit and honesty of just marching through and humiliating your opposition through a well-placed snarky one-liner.

But you can't debatebro the judge, and at this point, I think Destiny is being forced to confront that reality. 

Assuming this whole affair was real and not some kind of coordinated cloutfest by all parties involved (which it certainly well may still be-- we don't know for certain), this is a good time to reflect on how what you say online can be permanent and DOES NOT read back as well from a biased prosecutor in a court of law as it did when you feverishly spat it out in verbal or text format online to get an "own" by potentially compromising your reputation or making yourself vulnerable to attack later on if an opportunistic a-log wanted to take you on down the line.

All this to say, the Internet is a place where you CAN express your thoughts well and you CAN make a shit ton of money, but every action has at least one vulnerability, so you better learn to shore those up, or otherwise the day will come where others are going to see you as a fat pile of cash to take from. Destiny may be finding this out presently.

# orderedItems[].source.content
In light of the recent Destiny drama or whatever where his orbiter streamer e-girl is looking to collect $1M from him to pay for her law school, and all of the other Destiny orbiters snaked on Destiny, I feel like the best thing to say about the situation is this:

This is a cautionary tale of how you can only go so far online by "debatebroing" people in an "ends-justify-the-means" Machiavellian tactics kind of way without 1) making some actual friends; and 2) learning the ironclad rules about operating socially and keeping your money and reputation in tact.

Destiny thought brute-forcing his way through every conversation was enough "to win", but, in doing so, he's collected an ever-growing portion of his audience and "community" who feel jilted in some way and otherwise harbor some resentment for him. Maybe all of these current headwinds he's experiencing will come to pass, but it may also be that they don't, and it may come to the point where "the haters" will come to strip everything he has from him through very real big boy lawsuits.

Maybe I'm wrong here and this moment in time is just a passing one for Destiny, but the amount of uproar about this whole affair in the tangential online spaces that discuss Destiny and the greater e-celeb world lead me to believe that this may be the beginning of the end of Destiny's reign as the leading "free speech warrior of the people" in the online politics arena, and this may indeed be the killshot that forces him out of the "virality arena", to instead be relegated to a future of Internet irrelevance, serving to only captivate Cable TV boomers with tired and advertiser-friendly takes pre-constructed for him by whoever his future right-wing talk show handlers' writing room designates.

Lessons to learn from this for anyone who would ever have an interest in expressing opinions online for money in a meaningful way:

1) Don't be a retarded shitlib.
2) Own what you say.
3) Don't have women, and especially a slew of women, be a part of your associated act online.
4) Don't engage in the types of content online where you think you control the narrative but you kind of actually don't, and where things can boil over and get out of hand pretty quickly.

I've actually been very impressed in reviewing Destiny content the past few years of how he can actually defend any position / make about any argument very well. People won't usually give him this credit, but I will. He uses slimeball tactics to get there, but he gets the job done, and can hypnotize any midwit probably even better than any mainstream alternative. 

I've also been impressed with how he does just brute-force his way through spots where many others would've given up or issued empty online apologies and all that. There is a certain level of respect given to just the unapologetic grit and honesty of just marching through and humiliating your opposition through a well-placed snarky one-liner.

But you can't debatebro the judge, and at this point, I think Destiny is being forced to confront that reality. 

Assuming this whole affair was real and not some kind of coordinated cloutfest by all parties involved (which it certainly well may still be-- we don't know for certain), this is a good time to reflect on how what you say online can be permanent and DOES NOT read back as well from a biased prosecutor in a court of law as it did when you feverishly spat it out in verbal or text format online to get an "own" by potentially compromising your reputation or making yourself vulnerable to attack later on if an opportunistic a-log wanted to take you on down the line.

All this to say, the Internet is a place where you CAN express your thoughts well and you CAN make a shit ton of money, but every action has at least one vulnerability, so you better learn to shore those up, or otherwise the day will come where others are going to see you as a fat pile of cash to take from. Destiny may be finding this out presently.